بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر اثربخشی طرح‏های عمرانی انتقال آب سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان خراسان رضوی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

2 استاد گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 کارشناس ارشد اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

4 دکترای اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

5 کارشناس سازمان جهاد کشاورزی خراسان رضوی

چکیده

هدف مطالعه حاضر تعیین عوامل مؤثر بر اثربخشی اجرای پروژه‏های انتقال آب سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان خراسان رضوی بود؛ و در این راستا، با ارائه یک مدل مفهومی جامع، با استفاده از مدل معادلات ساختاری، چارچوبی برای ارزیابی این عوامل در هر پروژه فارغ از نوع و منطقه اجرای آن فراهم شد. گردآوری اطلاعات لازم از کارشناسان حوزه آب و خاک ادارات جهاد کشاورزی شهرستان‏های استان و همچنین، از کشاورزان منتفع از پروژه‏های اجراشده صورت گرفت. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که اثربخشی اعتبارات طرح‏های آب و خاک بیش از آنکه معطوف به نتایج عملیاتی و کیفیت اجرای پروژه باشد، حاصل اجرای پروژه‏های انتقال آب در زمان و مکان مناسب است. در همین راستا، پیشنهاد شد که طرح‏های آب و خاک در مرحله مطالعاتی با دقت بسیار مورد بررسی قرار گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An Investigation on Influencing Factors of Effectiveness of Water Transport Projects Financed by Agriculture Organization in Khorasan Razavi Province of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leili ABOLHASANI 1
  • Naser SHAHNOUSHI 2
  • Hamid TAHERPOUR 3
  • Matin FATEMI 4
  • Ali Asghar ALLAMEH 5
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
3 MSc in Agricultural Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
4 PhD in Agricultural Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
5 Expert of Agriculture Organization of Khorasan Razavi, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

To tackle the shortage of water resources, several water projects were financed by Agriculture [Jihad-e Keshavarzi] organization in Khorasan Razavi, among which water transport projects are of the most important ones. However, despite their significance, no studies were conducted about the factors contributing the effectiveness of water transport projects. Therefore, this study introduced a new conceptual model, consistent with different types of projects and local conditions, and estimated via structural equations model. Required data was gathered from experts as well as farmers who had applied the projects. The study results indicated that effectiveness of the projects was related to the apropos choice of time and location of implementation rather than to the operational outcomes or quality of construction. In the light of this fact, more meticulous studies at project implementation phase for each project was proposed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Effectiveness
  • Water Transport Projects
  • Structural Equations Model
  • Khorasan Razavi (Province)
  • Iran
  1. Abdarzade, P., Safarzade, H. and Fotovat, B. (2015). Identifying the factors affecting the success of strategic planning using structural equation modeling (case study: Tehran insurance Company, Tehran). Business Management, 7(2): 253-272. (Persian)
  2. Agricultural Production Report of Khorasan Razavi Province (2015). Available at http://www.koaj. (Persian)
  3. Akbari Bourang, M., Pour, S. and Ayati, M. (2014). Explaining organizational performance based on the inclination to entrepreneurship and intellectual capital: structural equation model, productivity management. Beyond Management, 8(30): 115-133. (Persian)
  4. Au, L., Wright and Botton, C. (2003). Using structural equation modeling approach (SEM) to examine leadership of heads of subject departments (HODs) as perceived by principals and vice-principals, heads of subject departments and teachers within “Schools Based Management” (SBM) secondary schools: some evidence from Hong Kong. School Leadership and Manag. 4: 481-498.
  5. Berim Nezhad, V. and Soleimanian, F. (2014). Investigation of the socioeconomic and environmental effects of Taleghan dam using structural equation model SE. International Journal of Management and Development of Agriculture, 4(3): 193-202. (Persian)
  6. De Sousa, J.F., De Sousa, J.P., Costa, Á., Farias, T., Melo, S., Chen, G. and Silva, J. (2014). Transportation: can we do more with less resources? 16th Meeting of the Euro Working Group on Transportation – Porto 2013 Estimating the Provincial Economic Impacts of High-speed Rail in Spain: An Application of Structural Equation Modeling. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111: 157-165.
  7. Farzi, H., Kordovani, P. and Moughali, M. (2012). Evaluation of lavar dam on groundwater of lavr fin plain (Bandar Abbas). Natural Geography, 5(15): 1-8. (Persian)
  8. Jenatabadi, H.S. and Ismail, N.A. (2014). Application of structural equation modelling for estimating airline performance. Journal of Air Transport Management, 40: 25-33.
  9. Karamouz, M., Mojahedi, S. and Ahmadi, A. (2007). Economic appraisal and determination of inter-basin water transfer policy. Iran Water Resources Research, 3(2/8): 10-25. (Persian)
  10. Mehregan, V. and Zali, M. (2006). In search of techniques for determining validity in management research. Management Culture Quarterly, 14(4). (Persian)
  11. Montazer, A. and Pashazade, N. (2011). Evaluation of water distribution performance in different conditions of utilization of the main channel of the west dose irrigation network using CANALMAN Hydraulic model. Water and Soil Journal, 25(1): 125-139. (Persian)
  12. Pazhm, S. and Sadr, S. (2007). Re-evaluation of the benefits and costs of Sophie's multi-purpose design. Agricultural Sciences of Iran (Specialty Economics and Agricultural Development), 38(2): 381-401. (Persian)
  13. Rezaie, R. and Safa, L. (2014). Analysis of the effects of rural leadership project using structural equation model (case study: Zanjan city). Geographic Space, 14(64): 151-171. (Persian)
  14. Santibáñez-Andrade, G., Castillo-Argüero, S., Vega-Peña, E. V., Lindig-Cisneros, R. and Zavala-Hurtado, J.A. (2015). Structural equation modeling as a tool to develop conservation strategies using environmental indicators: the case of the forests of the Magdalena river basin in Mexico City. Ecological Indicators, 54: 124-136.
  15. Seyedan, S., Abasi, F. and Ghadami, F. (2010). Technical and economic evaluation of irrigation with low pressure pipes (hydrophilic) and comparison with traditional irrigation and rainy irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 11(2): 73-84. (Persian)
  16. Sivase Marde, M., Ghaderi, S. and Mohamadpour, A. (2010). Evaluation of underground classical sprinkler irrigation systems (a case study of Mahabad city, West Azarbaijan province). Islamic Azad University, Mahabad Branch. (Persian)
  17. Shen, W., Xiao, W. and Wang, X. (2016). Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for urban rail transit: a structural equation modeling based on partial least squares. Transport Policy, 46: 20-31.
  18. Soleimani Pour, A. and Bagheri, A. (2007). Economic evaluation of the design of water mixing of wells with canal water for proper water supply in Isfahan saline lands. Agricultural Economics (Economic and Agricultural), 1(3): 159-174. (Persian)
  19. Yazdanbakhsh, S. (2001). Identification of factors affecting the capacity of food and beverage industries manufacturing and providing appropriate strategies to improve the situation of these industries (case study: Razavi Khorasan province). Master Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Mashhad Ferdowsi University. (Persian)
  20. Yazdani, M., Jalaliyan, H. and Pari Zangane, A. (2009). Evaluating the socio-economic and environmental impacts of watershed management plans (case study: Zanjanrood planning Program). Geography, 7(20-21): 81-96. (Persian)
  21. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. (1999). Program evaluation methods: measurement and attribution of program results.
  22. Vidan, A., Shoag, D., Voth-Gaeddert, L.E. and Oerther, D.B. (2014). Humanitarian technology: science, systems and global impact 2014, HumTech 2014 utilizing structural equation modeling in the development of a standardized intervention assessment tool. Procedia Engineering, 78: 218-223.