ترسیم الگوی چالش‏ های سیاست گذاری توسعه روستایی استان کردستان (با تأکید بر توان‎ افزایی و نقش‏ آفرینی در مسیر تحقق‏ پذیری سند راهبردی آمایش سرزمین)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای جغرافیا و برنامه ‏ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی و برنامه ‏ریزی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ‏ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی و برنامه ‏ریزی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

10.30490/rvt.2023.361364.1511

چکیده

از پیش ­نیازهای مهم در ارتباط با تحقق سند راهبردی آمایش استان کردستان به ­عنوان سند مبنا و بالادستی توسعه این استان که متکی بر توان‏ های محیط طبیعی و انسانی واقع در نواحی روستایی است، شناسایی و برطرف نمودن چالش ‏های پیش ‏روی سیاست­ گذاری مطلوب توسعه روستایی در راستای افزایش توان نقش‏ آفرینی مؤثر در مسیر تحقق اهداف و مأموریت‏ های تعریف شده این سند است. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر با ماهیتی کیفی و روش توصیفی- تحلیلی به گردآوری داده ‏های مبتنی بر مصاحبه ‏های نیمه‏ ساختارمند با عوامل و ذی‏ نفعان دخیل در عرصه توسعه روستایی و منطقه ‏ای استان (تعیین شده به روش هدفمند) پرداخته است. تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ ها پس از حصول به اشباع نظری با تکنیک تئوری بنیادی در راستای ترسیم الگوی پارادایمی، مبتنی بر شناسایی عوامل علی، محوری، زمینه ‏ای، مداخله‏ ای، راهبردها، پیامدها و در نهایت، ترسیم الگوی نهایی چالش‏ های سیاست­ گذاری توسعه روستایی استان با تأکید بر نقش ‏آفرینی در مسیر تحقق سند راهبردی آمایش استان انجام گرفت. یافته ‏ها با توجه به تعدد بازیگران، پیچیده‏ و درهم‌تنیده بودن صحنه گسترده عرصه‏ های توسعه روستایی و توسعه منطقه ‏ای و اسنادی با ماهیت فضایی به­ مانند سند آمایش نشان دادند که فاصله از سیاست­ گذاری توسعه منطق ه‏ای بر پایه مدیریت یکپارچه فضا (با تأکید بر سند راهبردی آمایش استان)؛ کیفیت نامناسب سیاست‏ های توسعه روستایی؛ اشکالات فرایند سیاست­ گذاری (مسئله ‏شناسی، تصمیم ‏سازی و تدوین سیاست‏ ها)؛ ضعف در حکمروایی روستایی و شناخت و ذهنیت نامناسب شخصی سیاست ­گذاران توسعه ‏ای مبتنی بر اصول منطقه ‏گرایی قدیم، سیاست­ گذاری خردگرا و بخشی ‏نگری به توسعه روستایی استان، مهم ­ترین چالش ‏ها در این عرصه هستند. لذا اصلاح فرایند، محتوا و کیفیت سیاست­ گذاری بر پایه منطقه‏ گرایی نوین، توسعه یکپارچه روستایی و خلق و ساماندهی فضای کمیاب توسع ه‏ای، لازمه اصلاح وضعیت نامطلوب موجود می ‏باشند. بر این مبنا، حرکت در مسیر ساماندهی فضای توسعه‏ ای استان و ساخت توسعه منطقه ‏ای پایدار مبتنی بر نقش ‏آفرینی نواحی روستایی در فضای جغرافیایی آن در چارچوب سند آمایش، نیازمند نگرش سیستمی، مدیریت یکپارچه و هم ‏افزا در ساختار و فرایند سیاست­ گذاری شبکه‎ای و ذی ‏نفع محورانه ‏خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Delineation of the challenges of rural development policy in Kurdistan province with emphasis on empowerment and role-playing in the realization of Kurdistan province's strategic document on landuse planning

نویسندگان [English]

  • S. Manoochehri 1
  • Y. Ghanbari 2
  • H. Barghi 2
1 PhD Student of Geography and Rural Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Associate Professor of Rural Planning, Department of Rural Geography, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

strategies and consequences, and finally, drawing the final model of the policy challenges of the rural development of the province with emphasis on role-playing in the direction of the strategic document of the province. Considering the multiplicity of actors and the complexity and interconnectedness of the broad scene of rural development, regional development and documents with a spatial nature such as the land use document, the findings showed that the distance from the regional development policy based on integrated space management (with emphasis on the strategic document of land use province), inappropriate quality of rural development policies, problems of the policy-making process (problem analysis, decision-making and formulation of policies), inadequate knowledge and personal mentality of development policy makers and weakness in rural governance based on the old regionalism, rationalist and sectoral policymaking in the rural development of the province, the most important challenges and the necessity of reforming the process, content and quality of policymaking based on the new regionalism, integrated rural development and creation as well as organization of rare development space, are necessary to correct the existing unfavorable situation. On this basis, moving in the direction of organizing the development space of the province and building sustainable regional development based on the role of rural areas in its geographical space, requires a systemic vision and integrated, synergistic management in the structure and process of development policy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • development policy
  • land use preparation and spatial organization
  • rural areas of Kurdistan province

مراجع

1.      Afsharipour, A., Barghi, H. & Ghanbari, Y. (2021).Appropriate policy-making for rural regions management in Iran. Land Use Policy, 109, 105669.
2.      Afsharipour, A., Barghi, H. & Ghanbari, Y. (2021). Identifying policy-making and planning challenges in rural areas of Iran by thematic analysis method. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 53(3), 1089-1101. [In Persian]
3.      Amar, H. & Haag, M. (2017). Exploring the critical success factors of Virtual-Agile IT projects: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 8(6), 427-438.
4.      Amoo, E. & Hataminejad, H. (2019). The pathology of Iranian land use planning. Journal of Regional Planning, 9(34), 27-38. [In Persian]
5.      Assche, K.V. & Djanibekov, N. (2012).Spatial planning as policy integration: The need for an evolutionary perspective. Lessons from Uzbekistan. Land Use Policy, 29(1), 179–186.
6.      Babaei, S. & Tavakoli, Gh. (2017). Deriving basic rationalities in public policy making process. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 3(1), 63-82. [In Persian]
7.      Badri, S.A., Rezvani, M.R. & Khodadai, P. (2018). Designing a pattern for challenges of spatial policy-making formulation in in Iran’ rural regions. Majles and Rahbord Quarterly, 26(99), 5-34. [In Persian]
8.      Barca, F., McCann, Ph. & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152.
9.      Bonn, I. (2005). Improving strategic thinking: A multilevel approach. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(5/6), 336–354.
10.  Connick, S. & Innes, J.E. (2003). Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(2), 177-197.
11.  Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.
12.  Darvishi, H., Akbari, M. & Ehterami, T. (2017). The identification of effective factors on deficiencies in regional development policymaking system in Iran: An interpretative-structural modeling, Majles and Rahbord Quarterly, 25(96), 237-263. [In Persian]
13.  Department of Enviorment Food and Rural Affairs. (2017). Rural proofing, practical guidance to assess impacts of policies on rural areas. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1121357/rural-proofing-guidance.pdf.
14.  Eftekhari, A., Darvishi, H., Rahmani, B. & sarrafi, M. (2019). Analysis of factors affecting the designing spatial development scenarios based on rural areas. The Journal of Spatial Planning, 23(3), 125-146. [In Persian]
15.  Estelaji, A. (2011). Comprehensive planning land preparation with emphasis approach systematic. Geography Quarterly, 3(10), 71-88. [In Persian]
16.  Fowler, L. (2020). Using the multiple streams framework to connect policy adoption to implementation. Policy Studies Journal, 1(1), 2-20.
17.  Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M. (2019). Defining rurality and the scope of rural planning, In book: The routledge companion to rural planning, New York: Routledge.
18.  Garrett, J. & Islam, Y. (1998). Policy research and the policy process: Do the twain ever meet? London: International Institute for Environment and Development Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods Programme.
19.  Gaugitsch, R., Messinger, I., Neugebauer, W., Schuh, B., Toptsidou, M. & Böhme, K. (2022). Rural proofing – A foresight framework for resilient rural, European Committee of the Regions. European Union.
20.  Gkartzios, M . & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning, New York: Routledge.
21.  Graetz, F. (2002). Strategic thinking versus strategic planning: Towards understanding the complementarities. Management Decision, 40(5), 456–462.
22.  Howlett, M. (2015). Policy analytical capacity: The supply and demand for policy analysis in government. Policy and Society, 34(3-4), 173–182.
23.  Jafari Moghadam, S., Zali, M.R. & Sanaiepour, H. (2016). Entrepreneurship development policymaking in tourism: A comparative study of selected countries. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 1(4), 21-40. [In Persian]
24.  Jost, S., Birringer, M. & Herzig, C. (2022). Brokers, prestige and information exchange in the European Union’s functional food sector – A policy network analysis. Journal of Functional Foods, 99(1), 105309.
25.  Nordberg, K. (2020). Spatial justice and local capability in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 78(4), 47–58.
26.  Liu, Y. & Zhou, Y. (2021).Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China. Land Use Policy, 102(5), 105288.
27.  Long, H. & Liu, Y. (2016).Rural restructuring in China. Journal of Rural Studies.47, 387-391.
28.  Mahdavi, A. & Azizmohammadlou, H. (2016). Exploring the effect of industrial policy structure on the quality and functioning of policies designed for Iranian small and medium industries. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 2(3), 55-77. [In Persian]
29.  Menzori, I.D., Sousa, I.C.N. & Gonçalves, L.M. (2021). Urban growth management and territorial governance approaches: A master plans conformance analysis master plans conformance analysis. Land Use Policy, 105(C), 105436.
30.  Meredith, D. (2008). The role of spatial planning in sustainable rural development, Working Papers 0818, Rural Economy and Development Programme, Teagasc. Available at: At: https://ideas.repec.org/p/tea/wpaper/0818.html.
31.  Mir Mohammadi, S.M., Kazemian, Gh. & Rezaei, S. (2021). The requirements of spatial planning implementation in the process of management and development. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 9(34), 360-389. [In Persian]
32.  Mohammadi, H.R., Monshizadeh, R., Rahmani, B. & Pakparvar, M. (2022). Systemic approach in spatial planning of rural development according to the structural-functional approach. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 54(1), 269-287. [In Persian]
33.  Moon, B.J. (2013).Antecedents and outcomes of strategic thinking. Journal of Business Research, 66(10),1698-1708.
34.  Nowell, L.S, Norris, J.M., White, D.E. & Moules, N.J. (2017).Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
35.  OECD. (2020). Rural well-being: Geography of opportunities, OECD rural policy reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/499ed299-en.
36.  OECD. (2006). OECD rural policy reviews: The new rural paradigm: Policies and governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
37.  OECD. (2008). Reinventing rural policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
38.  Peterson, H., Mcbeth, M.K. & Jones, M.D. (2020). Policy process theory for rural studies: Navigating context and generalization in rural policy, Politics & Policy, 48(1), 576-617.
39.  Pforr, C. (2005). Three lenses of analysis for the study of tourism public policy: A case from Northern Australia. Current Issues in Tourism. 8(4), 323-343.
40.  Prager, K., Nienaber, B., Neumann, B. & Phillips, A. (2015). How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management? Journal of Rural Studies, 37, 120-131.
41.  Qian, H. (2011).Towards the development of a spatial planning framework for rural development in china: a case study of jiangsu province. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester.
42.  Reimer, B. & Brett, M. (2013). Scientific knowledge and rural policy: A long-distant relationship. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(3), 272–290.
43.  Rezaei, S. (2018). Designing a revenue model for Iranian football clubs: With grounded theory approach. Applied Research in Sport Management, 6(3), 101-116. [In Persian]
44.  Rodrigues, C. & Fidelis, T. (2021). Distinctive features of spatial planning nearby estuaries – An exploratory analysis of water related rules in municipal master plans in Portugal. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 255(1), 107352.
45.  Saidi A. (2012). Structural-functional dynamism: An alternative approach to spatial. Space Economy & Rural Development, 1(1), 1-18. [In Persian]
46.  Shucksmith, M. (2009). Disintegrated rural development? Neo- endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Journal of the European Society for Rural Sociology, 50(1), 1-14.
47.  Slade, R, Hazell, P., Place, F. & Renkow, M. (2020). Evaluating the impact of policy research: Evidence from the evaluation of rural policy research in developing countries. Evaluation, 26(4), 541–561.
48.  Stahl, N.A. & King, J.R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26-29.
49.  Stevenson, N., Airey, D. & Miller, G. (2008). Tourism policy making: The policymakers perspectives. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(3), 732–750.
50.  The strategic document of Kurdistan province's land use development (2019). Prepared by the Management and Planning Organization of Kurdistan Province. [In Persian]
51.  Toimil, A., Losada, I.J., Hinkel, J. & Nicholls, R.J. (2021).Using quantitative dynamic adaptive policy pathways to manage climate change-induced coastal erosion. Climate Risk Management, 33(4), 100342.
52.  Tomaney, J., Krawchenko, T. & McDonald, Ch. (2019). Regional planning and rural development from: The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning, A Handbook for Practice Routledge.
53.  Varmazyari, H., Babaii, M. & Kalantari, Kh. (2020). Explanation of requirements for promoting Iran’s rural and nomadic development policymaking system based on Jihadi management style. Journal of Rural Research, 11(2), 214-233. [In Persian]
54.  Wanner, A., Seier, G. & Pröbstl-Haider, U. (2020). Policies related to sustainable tourism – An assessment and comparison of European policies, frameworks and plans. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 29, 100275.
55.  Weible, C.M. (2008). Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615–635.
56.  Woods, M. (2005). Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. London: Sage.
57.  Zhou, X. & Zhao, M. (2017). Comparison of territorial Spatial Planning System between China and Japan and its Enlightenment. Journal of Service Science and Management, 10(1), 54-71.
 
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار