روستا و توسعه

روستا و توسعه

سنجش پایداری نظام های بهره برداری در روستاهای استان چهارمحال‏ و بختیاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استاد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
2 پسادکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
چکیده
الگوی نظام ­های بهره ­برداری یکی از مباحث اصلی در توسعه بخش کشاورزی است. نیاز به مواد غذایی با رشد روزافزون جمعیت بیشتر می ­شود و در این وضعیت برای تأمین غذا و خودکفایی کشاورزی باید به یکی از مسائل بنیادی کشاورزی یعنی نظام­های بهره برداری، توجه خاصی مبذول شود. به همین منظور هدف از این پژوهش، سنجش پایداری نظام­های بهره­برداری در استان چهارمحال و بختیاری است. جامعه آماری پژوهش مورد نظر را بهره ­برداران خرد دهقانی و تعاونی تولید روستایی استان چهارمحال و بختیاری تشکیل داده ­اند. با توجه به گستردگی جامعه آماری، حجم نمونه تحقیق با استفاده از فرمول کوکران در مجموع، 750 بهره­ بردار بود. به ­منظور مقایسه دو نظام بهره ­برداری، حجم نمونه در نظام بهره ­برداری خرد دهقانی 380 و تعاونی تولید 370 بهره ­بردار تعیین شد. ابزار اصلی تحقیق، پرسش­نامه محقق ­ساخته است که داده­ های آن با استفاده از مدل ویکور مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد تعداد تعاونی‏ های پایدار، نیمه پایدار و ناپایدار در نظام ­های بهره­برداری تعاونی تولید به ترتیب هفت، ده و چهار تعاونی است. همچنین نظام بهره­ برداری خرد دهقانی در شهر فرخشهر و سامان، پایدار، در سودجان، شیخ شبان، بن، دستنا، بلداجی، فرادنبه، حیدری و آلونی، نیمه پایدار و در نافچ، شمس ­آباد، آورگان، گندمان، کنرک، امام قیس، دهنو، بهشت­ آباد، گهرو، تیشنیز و جونقان، کاملاً ناپایدار است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Assessing the Sustainability of Agricultural systems in Rurals of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces

نویسندگان English

H. Barghi 1
A. Hajarian 2
1 Professor in Geography and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Post PhD in Geography and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده English

Abstract
Introduction
Upon examining the documents, reports, and plans related to exploitation systems, it becomes evident that the concept of exploitation systems, agricultural land ownership arrangements, and their implications extend to complex issues in development economics and approaches to social transformation, encompassing historical perspectives. The complexity of exploitation systems is attributed to internal factors, highlighting the multifaceted nature of their structure. The sustainability of agricultural exploitation systems in Iran is analyzed through economic, social, and environmental dimensions. This research aims to assess the sustainability of exploitation systems in the villages of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces.
Materials and Methods
This quantitative research is applied in nature and employs survey methods to collect descriptive data through interviews and questionnaires.the diversity of the population, the sample size for the study using Cochran's formula was a total of 750 operators. To compare two farming systems, the sample size was determined to be 380 smallholder farmers and 370 cooperative producers. The main research tool was a researcher-made questionnaire, and its data was analyzed using the VIKOR model. A structured questionnaire with open and closed questions was used to gather information on personal details of respondents and dimensions of economic, social, and environmental sustainability indicators. The questionnaire utilized a 5-point Likert scale for responses. The statistical population comprises farmers in the villages of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province, including small farmers and rural production cooperatives.
Results and Discussion
The sustainability of exploitation systems was evaluated based on the QI value, with lower values indicating higher desirability. The Vicor model results revealed that among 21 rural production cooperatives, 7 had high stability, 10 exhibited moderate stability, and 4 were unstable. In small farming exploitation systems, 2 villages were stable, 8 were moderately stable, and 11 were unstable. Systems with QI values closer to zero demonstrated better stability, while values approaching one indicated decreased stability.
Conclusions
The research focused on measuring the sustainability of smallholder exploitation systems and rural production cooperatives in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province, emphasizing economic, social, and environmental indicators. The Shannon entropy method was used to weigh the indicators, and the Vicor model analysis indicated varying levels of stability among cooperatives and villages. Seven cooperatives were deemed sustainable, 10 semi-stable, and 4 unstable. Similarly, in small farming systems, some villages were semi-sustainable while others were completely unstable.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Assessing the Sustainability
Agricultural Systems
Agriculture
Rural Areas
Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Provinces
  1. Amini, A.M., Mazini, N. & Ghadimi, S.A. (2015). Comparative assessment the success of rural production cooperatives with other agricultural utilization systems (Case study: Townships of Kashan, and Aran Bidgol). Co-Operation and Agriculture, 4(14), 61-87. [In Persian]
  2. Alary, V., Messad, S., Aboul-Naga, A.M., Osman, M.A., Abdelsabour, T.H., Salah, A.A.E. & Juanes, X. (2020). Multi-criteria assessment of the sustainability of farming systems in the reclaimed desert lands of Egypt. Agricultural Systems, 183(2), 102863. https://doi.org/1016/j.agsy.2020.102863.
  3. Babazadeh, K., & mohammadzadeh, Sh. (2021). Determining the sustainable farming system from viewpoint of experts in the downstream lands of Karamabad Dam in Poldasht Township, Iran. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 9(36), 222-249. [In Persian]
  4. Badi, I., Shetwan, A.G., & Abdulshahed, A.M. (2017). Supplier selection using combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. In Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Ljubojević, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Management, Engineering and Environment (ICMNEE) (pp. 395-407). Belgrade: ECOR (RABEK). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3177276.
  5. Brower, F. (2004). Sustaining agriculture and the rural environment (Governance, policy, and multifunctionality). UK Edward Edgar Publishing Limited, Bibliometric Survey. European Society for Rural Sociology (Sociologia Ruralis), 56(1), 3-29.
  6. Calker, K.J.V., Berentsen, P.B., Giesen, G.W. & Huirne, R.B. (2005). Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming. Agriculture and Human Values, 22, 53-63.
  7. Candemir, A., Duvaleix, S. & Latruffe, L. (2021). Agricultural cooperatives and farm sustainability–A literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1118-1144.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12417.
  8. Castoldi, N., & Bechini, L. (2010). Integrated sustainability assessment of cropping systems with agro-ecological and economic indicators in northern Italy. European journal of agronomy, 32(1), 59-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.02.003.
  9. Behjani, M., & Pishbin, S. (2022). Investigating the effects of production cooperative companies on sustainable agricultural in city of Jahrom. Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, 2(1), 75-89. [In Persian]
  10. Ghanbari, Y., & Noori, S.H. (2008). Comparing farming systems with respect to their access to rural development indicators: A case study of Isfahan province of Iran. Village and Development, 10(4), 39-68. [In Persian]
  11. Hassanpour, B., & Amiri Ardakani, M. (2022). Determining the optimal exploitation system for agricultural sustainability in Kohgiluyeh-va-Boyerahmad province. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 17(2), 179-198. [In Persian]
  12. Mirzayi, K., & Sepahpanah, M. (2022). Assessment of social sustainability in Family farm Ssystems and Agricultural production cooperatives (Case study: The villages of Samen county). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 53(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2021.316769.669000. [In Persian]
  13. Mojaver Baghche, M., Rasouliazr, S. & Rashidpour, L. (2020). Analyzing and examining the challenges of small and peasant exploitation systems in West Azarbaijan province. Agricultural Extension and Education Researches, 12(4), 41-50. [In Persian]
  14. Omidi, N. (2022). Obstacles to the development of production cooperatives in border areas with a social and economic approach. Village and Space Sustainable Development3(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.22077/vssd.2022.5199.1096. [In Persian]
  15. Rasouliazar, S., keyvani Far, S. & Rashiedpour, L. (2016). A factor analysis regarding the barriers of agricultural production cooperatives from self-reported value of members in Bukan Township. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 5(18), 107-132. [In Persian]
  16. Sydorovych, O., & Wossink, A. (2008). The meaning of agricultural sustainability: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey. Agricultural Systems, 98(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.001.
  17. Zhou, Y., & Shao, H.B. (2008). The responding relationship between plants and environment is the essential principle for agricultural sustainable development on the globe. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331(4), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.008.