روستا و توسعه

روستا و توسعه

تحلیل شکاف عملکرد مدیریتی گلخانه‏ های تولید محصولات کشاورزی در استان تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 دانش آموخته مدیریت کشاوزی، گروه مدیریت و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 استاد گروه مدیریت و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
مقایسه عملکرد گلخانه‌ها در ایران با سایر نقاط جهان بیانگر عملکرد پایین این واحدها و ناکارآمدی مدیریت آن‌ها است. این در حالی است که سیاست توسعه کشت محصولات کشاورزی در محیط‌های کنترل‌شده مثل گلخانه‌ها با توجه به افزایش جمعیت بشر و وقوع تغییرات گسترده اقلیمی و لزوم مدیریت بهتر منابع پایه تولید و در راستای تحقق امنیت غذایی، در سال‌های اخیر بیش ­ازپیش مورد تأکید قرار گرفته است. بنابراین، این مطالعه با هدف ارزیابی عملکرد مدیران گلخانه‌های تولید محصولات کشاورزی در استان تهران انجام شد. حجم نمونه مورد مطالعه 140 واحد گلخانه از میان تعداد 2574 واحد فعال در این استان بود که به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها پرسش­نامه بود که از طریق مراجعه حضوری و مصاحبه تکمیل شدند. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روش‌های توصیفی و تحلیلی شامل شاخص‌سازی و تحلیل ماتریس اهمیت ـ عملکرد استفاده شد. نوآوری این مطالعه در ارائه شاخصی ترکیبی به‌منظور ارزیابی عملکرد مدیریتی گلخانه‌ها در سه بعد پیش، حین و پس از تولید و اندازه‌گیری شکاف عملکردی مدیران این واحدها بود. بر اساس یافته‌های این تحقیق، میانگین شاخص عملکرد مدیریتی در سطح گلخانه‌های مورد مطالعه 3/13 از 5 بود که در حد متوسط ارزیابی می‌شود. تحلیل ماتریس اهمیت ـ عملکرد نشان داد که گلخانه‌ها در 13 عملیات و به ­ویژه در انتخاب محصول مناسب برای کاشت، بهره‌گیری از فناوری‌های روز مانند اتوماسیون و فناوری‌های هوشمند و تهیه طرح توجیهی برای تولید در گلخانه دارای شکاف عملکردی بالایی بوده‌اند. این بدان مفهوم است که علی‌رغم اهمیت بالای هریک از این موارد در افزایش عملکرد مدیریتی گلخانه‌ها، وضعیت فعلی آن‌ها از حد قابل قبولی برخوردار نیست. لذا، پیشنهاد می‌شود ضمن ریشه‌یابی این موضوع، مواردی نظیر تولید فناوری‌های هوشمند سازگار با گلخانه‌های موجود، آموزش استانداردهای داخلی و خارجی تولید، بهبود سیستم‌های بسته‌بندی و حمل به بازار بیشتر مورد توجه قرار گیرند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of the Performance Gap in the Management of Agricultural Product Greenhouses in Tehran Province

نویسندگان English

A.A. Barati 1
M.A. Zandi Nezami 2
H. Shabanali Fami 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Development and Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Graduated Student in Agricultural Management, Department of Agricultural Development and Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Agricultural Development and Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
The world population is projected to reach approximately 9.6 billion by 2050, necessitating the production of nearly twice as much food as is currently produced. At the same time, basic production resources such as water, soil, and energy are becoming increasingly scarce due to climate change. These factors have posed significant challenges to humanity in ensuring sufficient food production. One strategy to address and adapt to these challenges is the development of agricultural cultivation in controlled environments, such as greenhouses. Although greenhouse crop production offers numerous advantages, inefficient management of these units can undermine many of these benefits. A comparison of greenhouse performance in Iran with that in other parts of the world reveals significant inefficiencies in their management. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate effective greenhouse management practices in Tehran Province.

Materials and Methods
The present study was conducted as survey research. The statistical population included all agricultural greenhouses in Tehran Province, comprising 2,574 active greenhouse units. From this population, 140 greenhouse units were randomly selected as the study sample. The sample size was determined using G*Power software. Additionally, 17 expert specialists were purposively selected to identify optimal management indicators for greenhouses. Data were collected through questionnaires administered via face-to-face interviews. For data analysis, both descriptive and analytical methods were employed, including indexing and Importance-Performance Matrix (IPM) analysis. To evaluate the level of good greenhouse management practices, a composite index comprising 33 indicators across three dimensions (pre-production, production, and post-production) was utilized, with scores ranging from one to five.

Results and Discussion
According to the findings of this research, the average area of the greenhouses was 6,360 square meters, ranging from a minimum of 300 to a maximum of 38,000 square meters. Over 90% of the studied greenhouses were privately owned, 85% had single-layer plastic coverings, and approximately 70% faced insufficient access to water. In terms of automation, 70% of the greenhouses lacked automation systems. The average management efficiency index for the greenhouses in the studied population was 3.21. The highest value of this index was associated with the pre-production management process (3.61), while the lowest value was linked to the post-production process (2.01). Based on the Importance-Performance Matrix (IPMA) analysis, greenhouse management exhibited significant performance gaps in 13 identified variables. Addressing these gaps would enhance management efficiency in greenhouses. Key areas for improvement include the development and implementation of automation and smart technologies, adherence to domestic and international standards, proper product packaging, and efficient transportation to market.

Conclusion
A comparison of the operational and managerial practices of greenhouse units in Iran with those in other parts of the world reveals significant inefficiencies and low productivity in Iranian greenhouses. This study highlights that a major contributing factor to this issue is the inadequate management of various greenhouse production processes, spanning from pre-production to post-production stages. Furthermore, the study indicates that inefficiencies in these processes and related operations escalate progressively from pre-production to post-production. The findings of the study demonstrate that management practices in the examined greenhouses remain largely traditional, with limited adoption of automation and smart production technologies. This is attributed partly to the lack of knowledge and skills among greenhouse managers in utilizing such technologies, and partly to the fact that these technologies are not well-adapted to their specific conditions. The study also emphasizes that variables related to pre-production processes hold greater significance compared to those during and after production. Additionally, the absence of mandatory production and technical standards, as well as underdeveloped supply chains that could support greenhouse farmers from input supply to product delivery and sales, represents another critical weakness. This gap discourages the transition toward modern and intelligent greenhouse systems. Therefore, it is imperative for policymakers and planners in this field to prioritize the development of robust supply chains for greenhouse products. Addressing the growing food demands of Iranian society, particularly in light of the ongoing water and soil crises and other constraints facing the agricultural sector, necessitates the expansion of cultivation in controlled environments such as greenhouses.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Agricultural Development
Greenhouse management
Yield improvement
Cultivation in controlled environments
Management efficiency
  1. Abalo, J., Varela, J. & Manzano, V. (2007). Importance values for importance–performance analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings. Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.009
  2. Abbasi, F., Zarei, Q., Porhemat, J. & Momeni, D. (2019). Challenges and priorities to improve productivity in the country's greenhouses. Knowledge base technologist. [In Persian]
  3. Alahvorn, M., Rabiei, V. & Zarei, Q. (2019). Evaluation of climatic suitability of greenhouse settlements under construction in alborz province by fao method. Third International Conference on Agricultural Engineering, Natural Resources and Environment, Tehran. [In Persian]
  4. Aldous, D.E., Dixon, G.R., Darnell, R.L. & Pratley, J.E. (2014). Education and training futures in horticulture and horticultural science. In G. R. Dixon & D. E. Aldous (Eds.), Horticulture: Plants for People and Places, Volume 3: Social Horticulture (pp. 1087-1115). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8560-0_6.
  5. Binaei, S., Shabanali Fami, H., Kalantari, K. & Barati, A. (2024). Investigation of developing smart agriculture in greenhouses of Tehran province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 37(4), 43-3450. https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2024.85975.1237.
  6. Castilla, N. (2013). Greenhouse technology and management (M. Omidi, Z. Shahbani, A. Shaghaghi, G. Mowahed, & F. Biranvand, Trans.). Tehran: Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research. [In Persian]
  7. Castillo-Díaz, F.J., Belmonte-Ureña, L.J., Batlles-delaFuente, A. & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2023). Impact of environmental policies on the profitability of greenhouse agriculture in southeastern Spain. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3639-3656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2616.
  8. Darabi, A., Salehi, R., Eslahi, M. & Malaekeh, S. M. (2016). Assessment of structural problems of vegetable greenhouses in Khuzestan province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 47(3), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2016.59352. [in Persian]
  9. Ghiat, I., Mahmood, F., Govindan, R. & Al-Ansari, T. (2021). CO2 utilisation in agricultural greenhouses: A novel ‘plant to plant’ approach driven by bioenergy with carbon capture systems within the energy, water and food Nexus. Energy Conversion and Management, 228, 113668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113668.
  10. Hassanzadeh, A., & Khodaverdi, F. (2019). Improving food security with the help of smart agriculture. Sixth International Conference on Innovative Ideas in Agriculture, Environment, and Tourism, Tehran. [In Persian]
  11. Hassanzadeh, S., Mohammadshahri, A. & Khodadadi, H. (2007). Design and implementation of climate control in industrial greenhouses using smart prediction methods 16th Annual Conference on Mechanical Engineering. [In Persian]
  12. Huynh, H.X., Tran, L.N. & Duong-Trung, N. (2023). Smart greenhouse construction and irrigation control system for optimal Brassica Juncea development. Plos one, 18(10), e0292971. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292971.
  13. Jamali Goldiani, H., & Vakili Rad, M. (2013). Smart greenhouses. The first national conference on intelligent building management systems with an energy efficiency approach, Tehran. [In Persian]
  14. Javadi Moghaddam, J., Ozlati, S., Zarei, G., Momeni, D. & Azadshahraki, F. (2021). Ventilation and cooling modeling and lyout of fans, pads and vents of an octagonal greenhouse. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 11(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v11i2.82130. [in Persian]
  15. Jha, K., Doshi, A., Patel, P. & Shah, M. (2019). A comprehensive review on automation in agriculture using artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2019.05.004.
  16. Kohpaei, M. (2011). Principles of agricultural economics. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  17. Maqsoudi, S. (2015). Designing and building a greenhouse at home and in apartments. Tehran: Aghaye Ketab. [In Persian]
  18. Maraveas, C., & Bartzanas, T. (2021). Application of internet of things (iot) for optimized greenhouse environments. AgriEngineering, 3(4), 954-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106993.
  19. Maraveas, C., Karavas, C.-S., Loukatos, D., Bartzanas, T., Arvanitis, K. G. & Symeonaki, E. (2023). Agricultural greenhouses: Resource management technologies and perspectives for zero greenhouse gas emissions. Agriculture, 13(7), 1464. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1464
  20. Ministry of Agriculture- Jahad. (2017). Agricultural statistics. Planning and Economic Deputy, Information and Communication Technology Cente. [In Persian]
  21. Mohamadi, F., Farajollah Hoseini, S.J. & Mirdamadi, S.M. (2015). Study of factors affecting economic sustainability in production of greenhouse products in Tehran province. Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.30490/aead.2015.58994. [in Persian]
  22. Naseri, M. (2019). Comparing yield and yield components of garlic (L. (Allium sativum) in greenhouse and field conditions. Greenhouse Vegetables, 2(2), 45-50. [In Persian]
  23. Ouazzani Chahidi, L., & Mechaqrane, A. (2023). Energy and economic analysis for the selection of optimal greenhouse design: A case study of the six Morocco’s climatic zones. Energy and Buildings, 289, 113060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113060.
  24. Presidential Scientific and Technological Vice President. (2019). Atlas of internal capabilities of Iranian technology companies. Tehran: Knowledge base technologist. [In Persian]
  25. Rafiei, S., Khoshnevisan, B., Mousaviavval, S.H. & Heydari, B. (2019). Management of energy consumption in greenhouses. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  26. Saeidirad, M. (2018). Engineering principles of greenhouse structures and facilities. Tehran: Agricultural Research, Education and Extention Organization Press. [In Persian]
  27. Salokhe, V.M., & Sharma, A.K. (2010). Greenhouse technology and applications (M. K. Ghasemi Gahsare, Akbar, Trans.). Shiraz: Koshamehr. [In Persian]
  28. Sayad-Mansour, I., Ebrahimi, M.S., Haghi, S. & Gholipour, J. (2015). The effect of training courses on improving managerial skills of greenhouse owners (Case study: South-Baraan district of Isfahan township). Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions, 6(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ejgcst.6.2.83. [in Persian]
  29. Sigar, C.P. (2023). A Review of greenhouse technology in agriculture. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Science. Engineering and Technology, 6(4), 834-846. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJMRSET.2023.0604021.
  30. Sharghi, T., Chardoli, M. & Ahmadi, A. (2020). Designing a model for technical development of greenhouses and analyzing its' influencing factors: The case of Pakdasht county. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 16(2), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.22034/iaeej.2021.225320.1514. [In Persian]
  31. Shiravand, D. (2018). Structural engineering and greenhouse Marze Danesh, Tehran. [In Persian]
  32. Sobhani, S.M.J., Jamshidi, O. & Norozi, A. (2018). The effect of knowledge, attitudes and satisfaction of greenhouse owners' cooperative members in Pakdasht County on sustainability of greenhouses. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(2), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2017.238218.668463. [in Persian]
  33. Tabatabai, J., & Taki, M. (2016). Greenhouse technology, construction and control of environmental conditions. Shahed University Printing and Publishing Center. [In Persian]
  34. Van Noort, F.R., & Sancho, R. (2024). Sustainable greenhouse-grown cotton research report: In association with Wageningen University Research and Dutch Cotton. Wageningen University & Research. Available at: https://edepot.wur.nl/679250.
  35. Zandi Nezami, M.A. (2023). Investigating the components of optimizing the management of agricultural greenhouses in Tehran province. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  36. Zarei, Q. (2013). Structural challenges of greenhouses in Iran. Strategic Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 2(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.22047/srjasnr.2017.110578. [in Persian]
  37. Zarei, Q., Momeni, D. & Javadi Moghadam, J. (2017). Comprehensive location guide for greenhouse construction. Agricultural Education Press. [In Persian]
  38. Zhong, , Qiao, R. & Wang, X. (2024). An innovative iot-based intelligent control system for agricultural greenhouses. International Journal of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, 2(3), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijmee.v2n3.10.