روستا و توسعه

روستا و توسعه

ارزیابی پایدار ی معیشت روستایی کشاورزان خرده مالک در استان های منتخب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران.
2 دانشیار، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران.
3 استادیار، گرو ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
4 دانشیار، مرکز آموزش عالی امام خمینی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران.
چکیده
تحلیل و تبیین سطوح پایداری معیشت روستایی می‏تواند نقش مؤثری در سیاست ­گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی توسعه پایدار روستایی ایفا کند. این تحقیق با هدف سنجش میزان پایداری معیشت روستایی کشاورزان خرده ­مالک در استان‏های البرز، گیلان، هرمزگان و یزد انجام شد. جامعه آماری این تحقیق سرپرستان خانوار شاغل در کشاورزی خرده­ مالک (481096=N) بودند که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 500 نفر از آنان به­ عنوان نمونه از طریق نمونه ‏گیری با انتساب متناسب مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. برای سنجش میزان پایداری معیشت روستایی در کل 38 شاخص، شامل 10 شاخص اقتصادی، 11 شاخص اجتماعی، 10 شاخص محیطی و 7 شاخص نهادی در سطح استان‏های چهارگانه فوق ارزیابی شد. این شاخص ‏ها با‌ روش استاندارد کردن، رفع اختلاف مقیاس شدند و سپس با استفاده از روش تحلیل مؤلفه‌های اصلی، وزن شاخص‌ها محاسبه و در آن­ها اعمال شد. در انتها، شاخص ترکیبی پایداری معیشت روستایی برای استان‏های مورد مطالعه محاسبه شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که 72/4 درصد از سرپرستان خانوار کشاورزان خرده ­مالک مورد مطالعه در وضعیت ناپایداری معیشت قرار دارند. به گونه ‏ای که استان گیلان ازنظر میزان پایداری معیشت با شاخص ترکیبی 0/273 در رتبه اول، استان هرمزگان با شاخص ترکیبی 0/017-در رتبه دوم، استان البرز با میزان 0/092-در رتبه سوم و استان یزد با شاخص ترکیبی 0/196- در رتبه چهارم قرار گرفته است. نتایج سنجش میزان پایداری معیشت روستایی بر اساس طیف پرسکات آلن نشان داد که استان گیلان نسبت به بقیه استان‏ها دارای وضعیت بهتری است، هرچند که نرخ پایداری معیشت در این استان هم در وضعیت ایده ‏آلی قرار ندارد و ناپایدار بالقوه است. استان‏های البرز، هرمزگان و یزد هم ازنظر پایداری معیشت در شرایط ناپایدار بالفعل قرار دارند. در رابطه با توصیه سیاستی این تحقیق نیز پیشنهاد می ‏شود بخش ترویج غیر زراعی در کنار ترویج کشاورزی در سازمان‏ های کشاورزی، میراث فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع دستی تأسیس شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

An Assessment of the Rural Livelihood’s Sustainability of Smallholder Farmers in Selected Provinces

نویسندگان English

J. Baghernejad 1
M.S. Sabouri 2
M. Shokati Amghani 3
A. Norozi 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini Higher Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده English

Abstract
Introduction
The majority of the working population in developing countries' agricultural sector are smallholder farmers, with over 80% cultivating lands below two hectares. Despite occupying only 12% of the world's agricultural land, these small farms produce 80% of the food in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Smallholder farms are defined as those with limited capital and assets, household labor, and less than 2 hectares of land. They typically involve mixed farming practices managed by family members, producing various crops and domestic animals. The average size of agricultural units in low- to middle-income countries has decreased from 1960 to 2000, while increasing in some middle- to high-income countries and almost all high-income countries. Smallholder farmers in rural areas of low-income countries make up more than two-thirds of the world's poor and food-insecure population. Assessing the sustainability of rural livelihoods for smallholder farmers focuses on their resilience and decision-making to sustain their livelihoods. It aims to identify livelihood sources, strategies, and goals to provide support and create a conducive environment for them. Smallholder farmers in developing countries face challenges in achieving sustainable livelihoods due to unfavorable social, economic, and political conditions. Sustainable livelihood, which challenges conventional views on poverty, participation, and development, has gained significant attention in rural development discussions, emphasizing livelihood insecurities as a root cause of rural poverty.
Materials and Methods
This research adopts a quantitative approach, specifically field research, in terms of practical purpose, variable monitoring, data collection method, and generalization. It employs a descriptive-analytical research design using a survey method. A researcher-made questionnaire was used as the research tool, validated through input from academic staff in the agricultural extension and education department of Azad University, Garmsar branch. The sample size of 500 individuals was determined using Cochran's formula, with an accuracy level of three-hundredths of the range of the smallest and largest average farm sizes in the four studied provinces. Simple random sampling with proportional allocation was employed to select household heads. The study utilized a multi-stage sampling method to select provinces, cities, and villages. Economic, social, environmental, and institutional indicators were identified to assess the sustainability of smallholder farmers' livelihoods in the studied provinces. Social indicators included negative indicators transformed into positive indices using a fixed value subtraction method. Data were collected through electronic questionnaires and correspondence with relevant authorities. The differences in measurement units and scales of indicators were resolved using the average division method.
Results and Discussion
After calculating and weighting the indicators, Gilan province ranked highest in terms of livelihood sustainability, followed by Hormozgan, Alborz, and Yazd provinces. The distribution of smallholder farmers indicated that the majority were in a state of livelihood instability. Economic sustainability was found to be better than other dimensions, contrary to previous research findings. Social sustainability was highest in Hormozgan province, with social and human capital being the most stable aspects of livelihood. Gilan province's favorable environmental and climatic conditions contributed to its higher livelihood sustainability compared to other provinces. Strengthening economic activities, both agricultural and non-agricultural, in rural areas is crucial for sustainable rural development. Financial literacy and extension services were found to positively impact livelihood sustainability. The study identified a gap in farmers' financial management practices and emphasized the importance of extension services in enhancing livelihood sustainability. Limitations of the study include potential biases in the random sampling method used.
Conclusions
Overall, the research findings highlight the importance of addressing challenges faced by smallholder farmers in achieving sustainable livelihoods and emphasize the role of various factors, including economic, social, and environmental aspects, in enhancing livelihood sustainability.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Rural Nonfarm Economy
Rural Livelihood
Smallholder Agriculture
Sustainable Livelihood
Sustainability Indices
  1. Ahmadi, A., Motieee, H., Riyahi, V. & Halalian, H. (2019). Analysis of levels sustainable livelihoods of villagers (Case study of villages in Saqez city). Rural Development Strategies, 6(1), 3-19. http://doi.org/10.22048/rdsj.2019.140559.1747. [In Persian]
  2. Ashley, C., & Carney, D. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. London: Department for International Development.
  3. Badko, B., Ghasemi Siani, M., Ranjbaraki, A., Shambiati, M.H. & Shakiba, A. (2020). Assessing the livelihood capital of mountainous villages with a sustainable livelihood approach (Case study: Kouhshah rural district, Ahmadi district -Hormozgan). JGSMA, 1(3), 53-65. [In Persian]
  4. Baghernejad, J., Sabouri, M.S., Shokati Amghani, M. & Norozi, A. (2023). Developing strategies for stabilizing the livelihood of smallholder farmers through non-farm activities: The application of the Swot-Ahp-Tows analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1199368.
  5. Chambers, R., Longhurst, R. & Pacey, A. (1981). Seasonal dimensions to rural poverty. Frances pinter.
  6. Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Cui, Y., Wang, W., Yu, L., Zhou, W. & Fu, Z. (2022). Influence of livelihood capital level and structure on rural households’ payment willingness for rural human settlement improvement: Evidence from Hubei province, China. Agriculture, 12(11), 1808.
  8. Darban Astaneh, A., Motiei Langroudi, S.H. & Ghasemi, F. (2019). spatial analysis of livelihood assets of farmers: A case study of rural areas, Shazand county of Iran. Village and Development, 21(4), 47-67. http://doi.org/10.30490/rvt.2019.85206. [In Persian]
  9. Devereux, S. (2001). Livelihood insecurity and social protection: A re‐emerging issue in rural development. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 507-519.
  10. (2004). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. london, sections 1-4 of eight. Available at: www.livelihoods.org.
  11. Downing, A. (1991). an alternative approach to theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word, 42(2), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1991.11435835.
  12. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Erenstein, O., Chamberlin, J. & Sonder, K. (2021). Farms worldwide: 2020 and 2030 outlook. Outlook on Agriculture, 50(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211025539.
  14. George, C., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2003). Sustainability impact assessment of world trade negotiations: Current practice and lessons for further development. Working or Discussion Paper.
    https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.30587.
  15. Gomez y Paloma, S., Riesgo, L. & Louhichi, K. (2020). The role of smallholder farms in food and nutrition security. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42148-9_2.
  16. Hajdu, F., Granlund, S., Neves, D., Hochfeld, T., Amuakwa-Mensah, F. & Sandström, E. (2020). Cash transfers for sustainable rural livelihoods. Examining the long-term productive effects of the child support grant in South Africa. World Development Perspectives, 19, 100227.
  17. Hansen, J.W., Vaughan, C., Kagabo, D.M., Dinku, T., Carr, E.R., Körner, J. & Zougmoré, R.B. (2019). Climate services can support african farmers' context-specific adaptation needs at scale. Frontiers In Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00021.
  18. Hosyni, S.A. (2014). Analysis of factors affecting the increase in income and employment for villagers in the Gilan province. Space Economy & Rural Development, 3(7), 19-34. [In Persian]
  19. Huang, L., Yang, L., Tuyến, N.T., Colmekcioglu, N. & Liu, J. (2021). Factors influencing the livelihood strategy choices of rural households in tourist destinations. J. Sustain. Tour. 30, 875–896.
  20. (2011). Rural poverty report 2011. new realities, new challenges: New opportunities for tomorrow's generation.
  21. Jafari, N., Karami, E.A. & Keshavarz, M. (2020). The impacts of the new agricultural extension system on improving knowledge and changing the behavior of farmers in Fars’s province. Iranian Agricultural Extension And Education Journal, 16(2), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.22034/iaeej.2020.243857.1551. [In Persian]
  22. Kalantari, K. (2018). Data processing and analysis methods in socio-economic research (using spss software). Tehran: Farhang Saba Publications. [In Persian]
  23. Khosrozadian, M., Ghanian, M., Abdshahi. (2016). Prioritization of agricultural exploitation systems for Behbahan township based on the model of sustainable livelihoods. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 5(19), 143-166. [In Persian]
  24. Li, H., Nijkamp, P., Xie, X. & Liu, J. (2020). A new livelihood sustainability index for rural revitalization assessment—A modelling study on smart tourism specialization in China. Sustainability, 12, 3148.
  25. Lipton, M. (2005). The family farm in a globalizing world: The role of crop science in alleviating poverty. Working or Discussion Paper. Avalable at: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42256.
  26. Liu, Y., Shi, H., Su, Z. & Kumail, T. (2022). Sustainability and risks of rural household livelihoods in ethnic tourist villages: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(9), 5409.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095409.
  27. Loison, A.S. (2016). Rural livelihood diversification in sub-saharan Africa: A literature review (vol 51, pg. 1125, 2015). Journal of Development Studies, 52(6), 915-915.
  28. Lowder, S.K., Skoet, J. & Raney, T. (2016). The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development, 87, 16-29.
  29. Mahmoodi, S. (2019). Providing and suggesting a model for diversification of economic activities in rural areas of Guilan province. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 8(29), 127-158. [In Persian]
  30. Manafi Mollayousefi, M., Hayati, B. (2023). Evaluation of agricultural sustainable development status in Yazd province using the multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches, 14(4), 159-177. [In Persian]
  31. Mbaiwa, J.E., & Stronza, A.L. (2010). The effects of tourism development on rural livelihoods in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(5), 635-656.
  32. Naab, F.Z., Abubakari, Z. & Ahmed, A. (2019). The role of climate services in agricultural productivity in Ghana: The perspectives of farmers and institutions. Climate Services, 13, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.01.007.
  33. Orsango, R., Rajan, D.S., Senapathy, M. & Bojago, E. (2023). An analysis of rural farmers' livelihood sustainability in Offa district, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 12, 100610.
  34. Paparrizos, S., Baggen, Y., van Dalen, M., Ploum, L. & Ludwig, F. (2023). Commercialization pathways for climate services for small holder farmers in the global south. Climate Services, 30, 100354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100354.
  35. Pour, M.D., Barati, A.A., Azadi, H. & Scheffran, J. (2018). Revealing the role of livelihood assets in livelihood strategies: Towards enhancing conservation and livelihood development in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 94, 336-347.
  36. Prescott-Allen, R. (1995). Assessing rural sustainability. International union for conservation of nature and natural resources-world conservation union.
  37. Riahi, V., Nouri, A. (2015). Variation of economic activities and achievement of rural sustainability case: Khoramdareh. Quarterly Journal of Space Economy & Rural Development, 3(4), 113-128.
  38. Savari, M., & Shokati Amghani, M. (2019). Identifying adaptation strategies for small-scale farmers in the face of drought in west Azerbaijan province. Spatial Planning, 9(4), 42-17.
  39. Fami, H.S., Amghani, M.S., Savari, M., Nasrabadi, M.M. & Moetaghed, M. (2021). The role of non-farming activities in the sustainability of peasant farming systems: A case in Osku county. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 11(2), 297-312.
  40. Shahrekie, M., & Sharifzadeh, M. (2015). Investigating the role of fish farming in sustainable rural livelihood of Zahedan County farmers. Journal of Rural Research, 6(1), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2015.54233. [in persian]
  41. Sharifi, Z., Nooripour, M. & Karamidehkordi, E. (2018). Assessing livelihood capitals and their sustainability in rural households (The case of the central district of Dena County). Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 13(2), 51-70. [In Persian]
  42. Shokati Amghani, M., Kalantari, K., Asadi, A., and Fami, H.S. (2018). Investigating the effective factors on land dispersion and fragmentation in East Azarbayjan province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49, 487–508. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2017.237776.668459. [In Persian]
  43. Shokati Amghani, M., Mojtahedi, M. & Savari, M. (2023). An economic effect assessment of extension services of agricultural extension model sites for the irrigated wheat production in Iran. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1-13.
  44. Shokati Amghani, M., Savari, M. & Choobchian, S. (2022). Vulnerability assessment of Iran's rural-farmer households during COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 994922.
  45. Soltani, A., Angelsen, A., Eid, T., Naieni, M.S.N. & Shamekhi, T., (2012). Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran. Econ. 79, 60–70
  46. Spangenberg, J.H. (2005). Economic sustainability of the economy: concepts and indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1-2), 47-64. https://doi.org/1504/IJSD.2005.007374.
  47. Statistical Centre of Iran. (2022). Available at: https://www.amar.org.ir/english. [In Persian]
  48. Su, M.M., Wall, G., Wang, Y. & Jin, M. (2019). Livelihood sustainability in a rural tourism destination-Hetu town, Anhui province, China. Tourism Management. 71, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.019.
  49. Tang, Q., Bennett, S.J., Xu, Y. & Li, Y. (2013). Agricultural practices and sustainable livelihoods: Rural transformation within the Loess Plateau, China. Applied Geography, 41, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.007.
  50. Tavakkoli, J., Mirakzadeh, A. & Ebrahimi, M. (2014). Assessment of socio- economic development level of the villages in central part of Koohdasht county. Journal of Rural Research, 5(1), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2014.51454. [In Persian]