روستا و توسعه

روستا و توسعه

بررسی روابط شبکه مرغداران صنعتی در روستاهای شهرستان شازند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 نویسنده مسئول و دانشیار گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 استاد گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
4 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
امروزه مفهوم شبکه از محبوبیت زیادی برخوردار بوده و تلاش­ های بسیاری برای بررسی رابطه بین شبکه کارآفرینان و توسعه کسب و کارها انجام شده است. بنابراین شبکه­ ها منبع مهمی برای کسب و کار و کارآفرینی محسوب می­ شوند. هدف اصلی پژوهش، بررسی روابط بین مرغداران روستاهای شهرستان شازند است. برای دستیابی به این هدف از روش تحلیل شبکه بهره گرفته شد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را تمامی مرغداران روستاهای شهرستان شازند در سال 1402 (68 مرغداری) تشکیل دادند. داده ­های مورد نیاز از طریق مصاحبه گردآوری شدند. نتایج تحلیل شبکه بر اساس شاخص تراکم نشان داد صرفاً حدود 14 درصد مرغداران با یکدیگر ارتباط دارند که بسیار ضعیف و شکننده برای شبکه است و به دلایلی نظیر حفظ پایداری و سلامت مرغداری­ ها و اجتناب از سرایت انواع آلودگی و شرایط محیطی خاص است. بر اساس نتایج شاخص انتقال‏ پذیری، امکان برقراری ارتباط هر واحد با طرف سوم 38/5 درصد است که در مجموع، مطلوب به نظر می ­رسد. یافته­ های شاخص E-I در بین گروه­های تحصیلی نشان داد بین مؤلفه­ های وجود ارتباط در شبکه مرغداران و سطح تحصیلات، رابطه مستقیم وجود دارد. به­ طوری­ که هرچه میزان تحصیلات افزایش می­ یابد ارتباط درون­ گروهی کاهش و ارتباط برون­ گروهی و انسجام اجتماعی افزایش می ­یابد. در مقابل در بین گروه‏های سنی ارتباط برون­ گروهی نسبتاً ضعیف است. عضویت در شبکه ­های کسب و کار کشاورزی موجب شکل­ گیری جریان اطلاعات، خرید ارزان ­تر مواد اولیه و دسترسی به بازارهای بزرگ­تر، امکان یادگیری مهارت­ ها، استفاده از تجربیات، همکاری در تولید، افزایش قدرت فروش، کاهش هزینه­ ها و نوآوری را فراهم می­ نماید که در نهایت منجر به مزیت رقابتی و موفقیت در کسب و کارهای کشاورزی می ­شود. بنابراین مشارکت در شبکه ­های ارتباطی تخصصی و رویدادهای صنعتی از جمله اجلاس­ ها، نمایشگاه ­ها، انجمن­ ها، شبکه ­ها و عضویت در نهادها و انجمن­ ها توصیه می ­شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Network Relationships of Industrial Poultry Farmers in the Villages of Shazand County

نویسندگان English

F. Ghasemi 1
A.R. Darban Astane 2
M.R. Rezvani 3
H.A. Faraji Sabokbar 4
1 PhD Student of Geography and Rural Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Corresponding Author and Associate Professor of Human Geography Department, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction
Currently, the concept of networks is widely recognized and extensive research has been conducted to explore the correlation between entrepreneurs' networks and business growth. Consequently, networks are regarded as a crucial asset for business and entrepreneurship. Companies employ networks and engage in network activities as an entrepreneurial strategy to enhance product development, attract new customers, expand resources, and optimize pricing structures. A business network is a intricate web of connections among individuals, companies, universities, government agencies, and other organizations with the aim of generating and sharing knowledge, capabilities, and resources to expedite the innovation process, achieve successful commercialization, and gain competitive advantages. A network approach involves identifying actors, their ongoing relationships, and the structural outcomes of these relationships. Networks, rather than individuals, firms, or nation-states, are the fundamental unit of analysis for understanding the global economy. Powerful actors are those who direct networks and exert influence. Their ability to do so depends on their control over key resources (physical, political, economic, social, and technological). In the network literature, it is commonly suggested that power in a network is determined by position (e.g., centrality) or the strength of connections between actors. Network relations must be both structural and relational. Networks are structural because the composition and interrelationship of different networks create power relations. They are relational because they involve interactions among powerful social actors. These relationships can take various forms such as laws, contracts, values, regulations.
Materials and Methods
This applied study provides valuable insights for various institutions, such as agricultural jahad and agricultural cooperatives. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed using a combination of library research and field methods. The statistical population consisted of 68 members of Shazand poultry farms, all of whom were interviewed individually. Each interview lasted approximately one hour, during which notes were taken and issues raised by the poultry owners were recorded. The study employed the social network analysis method to examine the interactions and connections among Shazand poultry businesses. The process involved conducting field interviews and observations with poultry business owners in Shazand city, coding the data and entering it into UCINET software as a matrix, identifying and categorizing the types of relationships between poultry business owners, and finally analyzing the network using software to explain the interactions between these businesses.
Results and discussion
By utilizing a network analysis method and exploring questions such as the nature of relationships, the formation patterns, the relationship between these patterns and behavior, and their connection to other social factors, this research aims to understand how individuals can access resources through communication with others. The network analysis results indicate that approximately 14% of poultry are interconnected, suggesting a weak and fragile network.
Conclusions
The findings suggest a direct correlation between communication components within the poultry network and educational attainment. Poultry farms with lower levels of education tend to engage in inter-group communication, and whereas education levels increase, there is a greater tendency to outsource communication, resulting in enhanced social cohesion. However, there are exceptions to this trend, such as poultry farms that have no connections to other farmers due to factors like non-indigenous status, limited resources, economic constraints, or lack of support from trustees. Some farms also maintain geographical ties with relatives and acquaintances in other villages, indicating familial relationships within the poultry network. Membership in business networks for agricultural enterprises facilitates information exchange, procurement of cost-effective raw materials, and access to larger markets. Social networks enable skill acquisition, knowledge sharing, collaboration in production processes, increased sales potential, cost reduction measures, innovation, and ultimately contribute to improved performance and competitive advantage for agricultural businesses.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Business Network
Poultry Farms
Network Analysis
Centrality Indicators
Shazand City
  1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.
  2. Andersson, U.R., Forsgren, M. & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Journal of Strategic Management, 23(11), 979-996.
  3. Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior. Journal of Technovation, 30(3), 195-206.
  4. Dicken, P., Kelly, P., Olds, K. & Yeung, H.W.C. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards an analytical framework for the global economy. Journal of Global Networks, 1(2), 89–112.
  5. Dimara, E., Goudi, A. & Skuras, D. (2003). Business networks and performance: A spatial approach, ERSA conference papers ersa03p329, European Regional Science Association.
  6. Dutta, D.K., & Hora, M. (2017). From invention success to commercialization success: Technology ventures and the benefits of upstream and downstream supply-chain alliances. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(2), 216-235.
  7. Feizi Derakhshi, M.R., Khodaei, A. & Zafarani Moattar, E. (2015). Discussions in the analysis of social networks. Tehran: Padina Publications. [In Persian]
  8. Franco, M., De Fátima Santos, M., Ramalho, I. & Nunes, C. (2014). An exploratory study of entrepreneurial marketing in SMEs: The role of the founder-entrepreneur. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(2), 265-283.
  9. Ghasemi, Z., Hossein Qolizadeh, R. & Noghani, Dokht Bahmani, M. (2018). Factors affecting the distribution of power in the organizational network with an emphasis on the network analysis approach. Organizational Resources Management Researches, 8(1), 133-155. [In Persian]
  10. Ghorbani, M. (2012). The role social network bin rangeland utilization mechanisms (Case study: Taleghan region). PhD Thesis of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  11. Hakansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.
  12. Hesam, M. (2015). Modeling for tourism distention development based on network analysis approach Case study: Mountain Vally villages Haraz, Amol. PhD Thesis of Geography, Faculty of Geography University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  13. M., & Rezvani. M.R. (2014). Investigate the status of financial support rural tourism businesses together with a network analysis approach (Case study: Haraz road restaurants). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 4(2), 127-142. [In Persian]
  14. Huang, H.C., Lai, M.C. & Lo, K.W. (2012). Do founders' own resources matter? The influence of business networks on start-up innovation and performance. Journal of Technovation, 32(5), 316-327.
  15. Jack, S.L. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 120-137.
  16. Jiang, X., Liu, H., Fey, F. & Jiang, F. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, network resource acquisition, and firm performance: A network approach, Journal of Business Research, 87, 46-57. 
  17. Lambooy, J. (2004). The transmission of knowledge, emerging networks, and the role of universities: An evolutionary approach, Journal of European Planning Studies, 12(5), 643-657.
  18. Martin, J.A., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (2010). Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 265-301.
  19. McGrath, H., Medlin, C.J. & O'Toole, T. (2018). A process-based model of network capability development by a start-up firm. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 214-227.
  20. Moghfeli, Z. (2016). The analysis of local stakeholders’ network for increasing the adaptive capacity of Pistachio producers (Case study: Damankouh rural district, Damghan towaship). Master Thesis of Geography Faculty of Geography University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  21. Mohammadi Kangarani, H., Shamkhi, T., Ashtarian, K., Arab, D.R. & Nok, D. (2009). Investigation of policy structure in legal authorities of institutions related to natural resources through network analysis of institutional relations (Case study: Kohgiloye Va Boyerahmad province). Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 62(2), 203-220. [In Persian]
  22. Nasirzade Vanhary, N. (2015). Network analysis of students and alumni of faculty of entrepreneurship, University of Tehran. Master Thesis of Entrepreneurship Development Faculty of Entrepreneurship University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  23. Navabakhsh, M., Attar, S. & Aboul hasani, S.R. (2012). Network politics approach: Extension of social capital notion to state analysis. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 4(2), 7-21.
  24. Öberg, C. (2018). The role of business networks for innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 4(2), 124-128.
  25. Oerlemans, L.A.G., Meeus, M.T.H. & Boekema, F.W.M. (2001). Firm clustering and innovation: Determinants and effects. Papers in Regional Science, 80, 337–356.
  26. Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Management Reviews, 5-6(3-4), 137–168.
  27. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Journal of Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.
  28. Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Journal of Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141–153.
  29. Sergaki, P. (2010). The role of networks on the competitiveness of agricultural cooperatives and small-medium enterprises along the supply chain in Greece, Food Economics- Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section, 7(2), 180 - 191.
  30. Story, V., O'Malley, L. & Hart, S.J. (2011). Roles, role performance and radical innovation competences. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management. 40(6), 952-966.
  31. Surangi, H.A.K.N.S. (2018). What influences the networking behaviors of female entrepreneurs? International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 116–133.
  32. Zeng, S.X., Xie, X.M. & Tam, C.M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Journal of Technovation, 30(3), 181-194.