شناسایی و تبیین ابعاد و مؤلفه های توانمندسازی زنان روستایی استان لرستان با استفاده از پژوهش روش های آمیخته

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران.

4 استادیار موسسه پژوهش های برنامه ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

زنان روستایی از پتانسیل­ قابل توجهی برای مشارکت در فعالیت­ های اجتماعی-اقتصادی برخوردار هستند و ارتقای توانمندسازی آن­ها، موجب حرکت به سمت توسعه می­ شود. هدف از این پژوهش، شناسایی و تبیین ابعاد و مؤلفه ­های توانمندسازی زنان روستایی استان لرستان با رویکرد اکتشافی و استفاده از پژوهش روش­های آمیخته کیفی- کمّی متوالی است. جامعه آماری مراحل کیفی (تحلیل داده بنیاد) و کمّی بعدی مطالعه شامل زنان روستایی شرکت­ کننده در برنامه­ های آموزشی- ترویجی سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان لرستان و کارشناسان حوزه زنان روستایی استان لرستان در سال 1399 است. داده­ ها از طریق مرور منابع، اجرای مصاحبه گروه متمرکز و پیمایش پرسش­نامه ­ای جمع ­آوری شد. روایی صوری و محتوایی و پایایی ابزار سنجش با کسب نظر اصلاحی کارشناسان حوزه زنان روستایی و انجام آزمون ­های مربوطه تأیید شد. یافته­ ها نشان داد که پنج بعد آموزش جامع، ویژگی­ های فردی- روان­شناختی، اقتصادی، ساختاری و اجتماعی- فرهنگی در توانمندسازی زنان روستایی استان لرستان نقش دارند. 52 گویه نیز برای مؤلفه­nهای این ابعاد تبیین شد. بنابراین، توصیه می­ شود که این ابعاد و مؤلفه­ های توانمندسازی برای بهبود کیفیت اجرای پروژه­ ها و برنامه­ های ویژه زنان روستایی استان لرستان مورد توجه قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification and Explanation of the Dimensions and Components of Rural Women's Empowerment in Lorestan Province Using Mixed Methods Research

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Zafarinasab 1
  • Z. Golzari 2
  • M. Nourian 3
  • S.H. Razavi 4
1 PhD Student in Educational Management, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch of Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, South Tehran Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (z_golzari@azad.ac.ir)
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, South Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Institute for Planning Research, Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Introduction
It is very clear that in today's world, empowered women are one of the main indicators of the superiority of a society over other societies, because they will significantly increase individual performance to achieve society's goals. A developed society needs capable women so that they can create good and novel ideas and then realize them by participating in decision-makings and activities. Rural women, as hidden workers, play a vital role in home and farm activities, especially in planting, growing, harvesting, and processing livestock products. By empowering rural women, they can find appropriate solutions for problems in terms of technical, skill, interaction, etc. In other words, capable rural women can understand their duties well before they are told what to do‌. Empowerment strategies include equal access to opportunities, resources, credits, and education. Studies show that by empowering women, the whole society finds benefits, because empowered rural women expand the acquired capabilities in the family. They act like catalysts. By transferring the acquired abilities to others, on the one hand, the time to reach the development goals is reduced, and on the other hand, the desired goals are achieved more easily.
Materials and Methods
The present research is a sequential qualitative-quantitative mixed research with an exploratory approach. In the qualitative part, the dimensions and components of rural women's empowerment were first extracted using the meta-composite method. Due to the existence of an information gap in the data, an attempt was made to resolve this gap by using the foundation's data theory. The population of this phase of the research to conduct interview of a focus group included experts in the field of women (N=64) and a number of rural women who work in the projects of the Agriculture-Jahad Organization (N=36324). The categories extracted from the qualitative section were converted into questionnaire items, and in the quantitative section, they were validated with the help of a questionnaire survey and factor analysis. The population of the quantitative section included 80 experts from the Office of Rural Women Affairs and the service centers of Lorestan province. Due to the limited statistical population, all of them were considered as samples. In this phase, a five-item Likert scale was used to measure the importance of the measurement items. Ensuring the quality of the questionnaire, its validity and reliability were checked. The face validity of the questionnaire was checked and confirmed by providing corrective opinions of relevant experts and professors. Cronbach's alpha test was also used to check the ‌reliability. The results showed that the questionnaire has acceptable reliability and all alpha values are higher than 0.70
Results and Discussion
The findings in the metacomposition section showed that 14 survey sources, 12 review sources,‌ 13 ‌descriptive sources,‌ and ‌1‌‌‌causal-comparative source were used in metacomposition, 70% of which had a quantitative approach, 27% a qualitative approach, and 3% enjoyed a mixed approach. Also, research tools included 23% of sources and documents; 57%, questionnaire; 10% interviews and 10% a combination of questionnaires and interviews. The results of the analysis in the quantitative part are chi-square value of 1.27 degrees of freedom, which is at the optimal threshold of less than 3. Also, the root mean square error of estimation (RMSEA) should be less than 0.08, which is 0.051 and acceptable. The values of goodness of fit indices of GFI and AGFI, NFI and CFI should also be more than 0.90, which in the present study are 0.97, 0.95, 0.97 and 0.98, respectively, and are at the optimal level. Therefore, the dimensions and components obtained from the qualitative step of the study have the necessary quality to present the rural women's empowerment model of Lorestan province.
The t value of all indicators is higher than 1.96 and significant at the level of less than 0.05. Also, the values of the factor loadings showed that all the measurement items are at an acceptable level above 0.5. The values of Cronbach's alpha were higher than 0.7 and were acceptable. The calculation of composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) values and their placement at higher levels than the acceptance threshold of 0.7 and 0.5, respectively, also construct the validity. In order to check the diagnostic validity, the Fornell-Larker criterion was used. The investigation showed that the square root of the AVE values is all greater than the internal correlation values between the other components of the model at a significance level of less than 0.05. This finding shows how different the measurement items of one component are from other components. Based on this, the model has the necessary diagnostic validity.
Conclusions
In this research, it has been tried to identify and explain the dimensions and components of rural women's empowerment in Lorestan province. The findings of this research showed that although some dimensions of rural women's empowerment are consistent with the results of previous literature (such as educational, structural and socio-cultural dimensions); it is diverted in parts due to having a comprehensive, broad and context-oriented view on the problem of explaining and classifying the dimensions and components of rural‌ women's‌ empowerment ‌‌through successive quantitative and qualitative mixed studies and including the benefit of focus group interviews with rural women and experts. The field of rural women is distinguished from other conducted researches. Based on this, the main dimensions of empowerment of rural women in Lorestan province include five dimensions of comprehensive education, individual-cognitive, economic, structural and socio-cultural, which have been reported in the findings of some previous researches. Therefore, the obtained results show double importance of these dimensions in the issue of empowering rural women and also achieving rural development. In addition, 52 items were identified, explained and classified for the twelve components of these dimensions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rural Development
  • Empowerment
  • Rural Women
  • Lorestan Province
  1. Abtahi, H. & Abbasi, S. (2007) . Empowerment of employees, Karaj: Institute of Management Research and Training. [In Persian]
  1. Abayomi, A. & Abadat, A.­(2008).­The roles of selected NGOs in economic mpowerment of rural women in Ibadanland, Nigeria. Gender and Behaviour, 6(2), 1870-1883. DOI:4314/gab.v6i2.23425.
  2. Abolfathzadeh, Z. Yousfi, A. & Amini, A.M. (2016). Evaluation of effective factors in empowering rural women of Isfahan city, Women's Study Journal, 7(1), 1-27. [In Persian]
  1. Akbarpour, M. (2016). The role and performance of villagers' entrepreneurship in rural entrepreneurship (Case study: Central district of hashtrood county), Journal of Geography and Environmental Sustailability, 6(18), 51-66. [In Persian]
  1. Akhter, J., Kun, C. & Chukwunonso, O. (2018). Rural women’s empowerment is generated through microcredit schemes: Opportunities in Bangladesh. Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research, 1(8), 58-64.
  2. Alizad, E. & Bahrami, S. (2017). The role of rural women in creation green jobs: A case study of two villages in Golestan. Journal of Social Work, 2(7), 121-150. [In Persian]
  3. Alkire, S., Meinzen-Dick, R., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A.R., Seymour, G. & Vaz, A. (2013). The women’s empowerment in agriculture index, OPHI Working Paper NO. 58.
  4. Arabkhani, A. Sidmirzaei, S.M. & Kaldi, A. (2018). Development of a conceptual model of rural women's empowerment using data-based theory (Case study: Eshgabad district of Neishaboor city), Khorasan Cultural-Social Studies Quarterly, 13(3), 89-116. [In Persian]
  5. Bandura, A.(1997). Cultivate self–efficacy for personal and organiz ational effectiveness. New York: Freeman.
  6. Barro, R.J. & Lee, J.W. (1993). International comparisons of educational attainment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 363-394.
  7. Blanchard, K. Carlos, J. Randolph, A. (1999) The three keys of empowerment, Translated by: Fazlollah Nabi, Tehran: Fara. [In Persian]
  8. Bohrer, N. (2017). Rural womens empowerment in the sustainable development era. Available at: huairou.org.
  9. Bushra, A. & Wajiha, N. (2015). Assessing the socio-economic determinantsof women empowerment in Pakistan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 3-8.
  10. Charmchian Langerodi, M. & Alibeigi, A.H. (2012). Factors influencing the psychological empowerment of rural women. Journal of Women and Society, 4(1), 165-192. [In Persian]
  11. Cheung, C., Baum, T. & Wong, A. (2012). Relocating empowerment as a management concept for Asia. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 36-41.
  12. Dewettinnck, K., Singh, J. & Buyens, D. (2003). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Reviewing the empowerment effects on critical work outcomes. Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium03/210, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  13. Diiro, G.M., Seymour, G., Kassie, M., Muricho, G. & Muriithi, B.W. (2018). Women’s empowerment in agriculture and agricultural productivity: Evidence from ruralmaize farmer households in western Kenya, Plos one, 13(5), 1- 27.
  14. Ericsson, K. (2003). The development of elite performance and deliberate practice: An update from the perspective of the expert-performance approach. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312796753thedevelopmentofeliteperformanceanddeliberatepracticeanupdatefromtheperspectiveofthe expert-performanceapproach.
  15. Farasatkhah, M. (2017). Qualitative research method in social sciences with emphasis on grounded theory (GTM). Tehran: Agah publications. [In Persian]
  16. Fewer, S., Ramos, J. & Dunning, D. (2013). Economic empowerment strategies for adolescent girls. Available at: Economic Empowerment Strategies for Adolescent Girls. The Communication Initiative Network (comminit.com).
  17. Fornell, C. & larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  18. Ghasemi, M., Alizadeh, L. & Kandahari, A. (2017). Development of psychological empowerment strategies for rural women using swot-qspm strategic management tools, Women in Development and Politics, 16(1), 79-109. [In Persian]
  19. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  20. Han, S. Pool. J. Tran, J. Dally, W. (2015). Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural networks. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1, 1135–1143.
  21. Kazemi Kordalivand, S., Yari Hesar, A. & Heydari Sarban, V. (2014). Assessing the economic effects of implementing the pilot project in rural settlements) study sample: Central part of Khorramabad city. The third national conference on sustainable rural development. [In Persian]
  22. Hill, R. (1998). What sample size is “enough” in internet survey research? Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6, 3-4.
  23. Howell Smith, M.C., Babchuk, W.A., Stevens, J., Garrett, A.L., Wang, S.C. & Guetterman, T.C. (2020). Modeling the use of mixed methods–grounded theory: Developing scales for a new measurement model. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2) ,184-206.
  24. Isaac, S. & Michael, W.B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collectiom of priciples, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences. San Diego: Edits Publishers.
  25. Jalilian, S. & Saadi, H. (2014). Investigating the effect of socio-economic components on the psychological ability of rural women in Islamabad Qarb, Journal of Rural Research, 6(4), 745-767. [In Persian]
  26. Jamshidi, A. & Gamini, D. & Nazari Sarmazeh, H. (2013). Investigating the factors promoting and inhibiting the development of rural women entrepreneurship in Miankoh district, Ardal township. Women and Society Quarterly, 5(1), 75-94. [In Persian]
  27. Kassin, S., Anne Tubb, V., Hosch, H.M. & Memon, A. (2001). On the general acceptance of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychological Associati 56(5), 405-416.
  28. Khatibi, F.S. & Indira, M. (2011). Empowerment of women through self help groups and environmental management: Experiences of NGOs in Karnataka state, India. Journal of Human Ecology, 34(1), 29-40.
  29. Lange, S. (1993). Criteria for empowering women, Tehran: Roshangaran.
  30. Mallak, L.A. & Kurstedt, H.A.J. (1996). Understanding & using empowerment to change organizational culture. Industrial Management, 38(6), 8-10.
  31. Mamatha.(2018). Conceptual understand in of women empowerment in India. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 4(2), 90-94.
  32. Mandal, K. (2013). Concept and types of women empowerment. International Forum of Teaching & Studies, 9(2), 17-30.
  33. Mohammadi Yeganeh, B., Cheraghi, M. & Yazdani, Z. (2015). Analysis of factors affecting the distribution of poverty in rural areas, with emphasis on socio-economic characteristics, case study of Mahmoudabad county, Shahin Dej county. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 4(13), 83-96. [In Persian]
  34. Mohammadi, Y., Awatefi Akmal, F. Zamiri Arasteh, M. (2018). The effects of micro financing and empowerment in Kermanshah and Hamedan provinces. Space Economy & Rural Development, 7(4), 169-188. [In Persian]
  35. Motiei Langroudi, S.H., Ghadiri Masoom, M., Dadvar Khani, F., Yadollahi Farsi, F. & Torkashvand, Z. (2016). Explaining the factors affecting rural empowerment in entrepreneurship development (Case study: Zand and Saman cunties of Malayer township). Human Geography Researches Quarterly, 80, 119-138. [In Persian]
  36. Mousavi, M. & Ravankhah, F. (2015). Analysis of the relationship between welfare systems and women's economic empowerment, Women's Social Psychological Studies, 14(1), 101-73. [In Persian]
  37. Mozaffari, A. (2015). The role of mass media in sustainable development with the approach of women's empowerment. Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 7(3),123-137 [In Persian]
  38. Nath, L. & Dutta , S. (2017). Occupation of women and their empowerment level: A study of the rural women of Nagaon district of Assam, Journal of Economic & Social Development, 8(1), 135-142.
  39. Nikooghadam, M., Gholizadeh Amirabad, M. & Khoshnoodi, A. (2018). The effect of female empowerment on the democracy development. Woman in Development and Politics Quarterly, 16(4), 621-640. [In Persian]
  40. Noruwa, A. & Emeka, J. (2012). The role and sustainability of microfinance banks in reducing poverty and development of entrepreneurship in urban and rural areas in Nigeria. International Journal of Business Administration, 3(3), 33-40.
  41. Oliyaie, M. & Dehghan Neyestanaki, M. (2012). The assessment of the female carpet weavers ecoomic abilites in Takab Afshar anf thir role in rural development (Case of study: Villages of Takab division). Social Development Studies of Iran, 5(1), 67-81. [In Persian]
  42. Quinn, R.E. & Speritzer, G.M. (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamic 26, 37-49.
  43. Rouhani, A., Anbarloo, M. & Yousfi Taleghani, A. (2017). The place of rural empowerment in the social development of rural settlements, a case study: Daram rural district of Tarom city. Geographical Engineering of the Land, 1(2), 107-119. [In Persian]
  44. Shafiei Sabet, N. & Yousfi, S. (2015). Explaining the effective factors on the empowerment of women in the development process of rural settlements (Case study: Gilvan area and Ab-bar in Tarem city), Researches Earth Science, 7(1), 44-61. [In Persian]
  45. Tarasi, Z., Karimzadeh, H. & Agayari Hir, M. (2019). Investigating the factors and stimuli affecting the empowerment of rural women (Case study: Zanjan county). Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 19(54), 237-257. [In Persian]
  46. Tofighiyanfar, A.H., Azizi, J., Seifouri, B., Behjati-Assal, A. & Ghaed Givi, F. (2015). Studying the relationship between the self-sufficiency plans of the Imam Khomeini (ra) Relief Committee and empowering women. The head of the household (Case study: Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad provinces), Journal of Women and Society, 7(2), 89-114. [In Persian]
  47. Thomas, K.W. & Velthouse, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motiveation. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.
  48. Verma, S. (2016). Gender, agriculture and sustainable development in India: Women's marginalization or empowerment. In third isa forum of sociology.
  49. Vosoghi, L. & Ghasemi, M. (2014). Ecotourism and empowerment of rural women (Case study: Shib Daraz village, Qeshm Island). Women in Development and Politics, 12(4), 593-610. [In Persian]
  50. Wahid, N.A., Aziz, N.N.A. & Halim, R.A. (2017). Networking and innovationper formance of micro-enterprises in malaysia: the moderating effects of geographical location”, Perrtanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(5), 281-292.
  51. Vatankhah Noghani, A., Ghasemi, M. & Javan, J. (2016). Identifying and prioritizing strategies for women's empowerment in the first immigrant villages (Mashhad city). Social and Psychological Studies of Women, 14(3), 61-92. [In Persian]
  1. World­­bank (2015). Available at: https://­openknowledge­.worldbank.­org­/handle­/10986 /4391.
  2. Wyndow, P., Jianghong, L., Mattes, E. (2014). Female empowerment as a core driver of democratic development: A dynamic panel model from 1990 to 2005. World Development, 52, 34–54. Available at:.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.06.004.
  1. Zabihi, M., Ebrahimipour, H. & Arefinia, H. (2012). Investigating the relationship between dimensions of organizational structure and dimensions of psychological competence in employees of Mashhad university of medical sciences, Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management, second year, 2(1), 48-58. [In Persian]
  2. Zahedi, Sh. (2007). Woman and development. Tehran: Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
  3. Zimmer, l. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 11-18.