اهمیت و اثربخشی نهادهای تأثیرگذار بر توسعه گردشگری روستایی (کاربرد روش تحلیل شبکه)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 نویسنده مسئول و استادیار گروه توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران. (ebrahimi_ms@iut.ac.ir)

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

محققان توسعه پایدار بر نقش بی‌بدیل نهادها در اثربخشی جریان توسعه معتقد هستند. اهمیت و اثربخشی نهادها به گونه­ ای است که در رویکردهای جدید توسعه پایدار به‌عنوان یکی از چهار بعد اساسی توسعه پایدار قلمداد می‌شود و در کنار ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی قرار می­گیرد. تحقیق حاضر به بررسی اهمیت و اثربخشی نهادهای تأثیرگذار بر توسعه گردشگری روستایی با استفاده از کاربرد تحلیل شبکه پرداخته است. روش تحقیق حاضر از نوع توصیفی- تحلیلی است. ابزار اصلی تحقیق پرسش­نامه است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق خانوارهای روستای در چهار روستای هدف گردشگری در دهستان طرقبه، شهرستان بینالود در استان خراسان رضوی است. داده‌های لازم از 200 خانوار روستایی در دهستان طرقبه جمع‌آوری شد. به‌منظور سنجش پایایی ابزار تحقیق (پرسش­نامه) از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و جهت روایی پرسش­نامه از ضریب KMO استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل شبکه نشان داد که شش نهاد مؤثر در توسعه گردشگری روستایی عبارت‌اند از: شورا، دهیار، بخش خصوصی، سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری، بخشداری، NGOs و سایر ادارات دولتی. همچنین نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که از دیدگاه روستاییان اهمیت و اثربخشی نهادهای محلی مانند شورا، دهیار و نهادهای تخصصی مانند بخش خصوصی و سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع ‌دستی و گردشگری در توسعه گردشگری از سایر نهادهای دخیل در فرایند توسعه گردشگری روستایی بیشتر است. همچنین تمایل مشارکت روستاییان با نهادهای محلی و تخصصی بیشتر از نهادهای دولتی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Importance and Effectiveness of Institutions Affecting on the Development ofRural Tourism (Application of Network Analysis Method)

نویسندگان [English]

  • M.S. Ebrahimi 1
  • M. Yaghobi 2
1 Corresponding Author and Assistant Professor of Rural Development Department, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (ebrahimi_ms@iut.ac.ir)
2 MSc Graduate of Rural Development, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Sustainable development researchers believe in the irreplaceable role of institutions in the effectiveness of the development process. The importance and effectiveness of institutions is such that in the new approaches of sustainable development, it is considered as one of the four basic dimensions of sustainable development, and it is placed next to the economic, social and environmental dimensions. The present study examines the importance and effectiveness of institutions affecting the development of rural tourism using the application of network analysis. The present research method is descriptive-analytical. The main research tool is the questionnaire. The statistical population of this study is the households of the villages in four tourist target villages in Torqabeh district, Binalood county in Khorasan Razavi province. Necessary data were collected from 200 rural households in Torqabeh district. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure the reliability of the research tool (questionnaire) and KMO coefficient was used for the validity of the questionnaire. The results of the network analysis showed that the six effective institutions in the development of rural tourism are: the council, the villager, the private sector, the organization of cultural heritage, handicrafts and tourism, the district administration, NGOs and other government departments. Also, the results of the research showed that from the point of view of the villagers, the importance and effectiveness of local institutions such as the council, the villager and specialized institutions such as the private sector and the organization of cultural heritage, handicrafts and tourism in the development of tourism is more than other institutions involved in the development of rural tourism. Also, the willingness of villagers to participate with local and specialized institutions is more than with government institutions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rural Tourism
  • Institutions
  • Effectiveness
  • Network Analysis

مراجع

  1. Alalhesabi, M. (2011). Participatory rural planning emprical study on the role of vilaagers in planning rural development. Housing and Rural Environment, 30(134): 35-48. (Persian)
  2. Alavizadeh, A. and Mirlotfi, M.R. (2013). The role of non-farm economy on rural immobility in rural settltments Semirom county. Regional Planning Quarterly, 3(10): 71-82. (Persian)
  3. Barghi, H. Ghanbari, Y. and Saeedi, M. (2013). A study of the performance of rural Islamic councils and the level of people's participation in rural development (Case study: Hosseinabad rural district of Najafabad city). Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, 2(2): 119-138. (Persian)
  4. Basiri Parsa, N. (2010). Survey of effective institutions in rural development management (Case study: Hamadan province). National Conference on Human, Environment and Sustainable Development. Hamadan. (Persian)
  5. Bastani, S. and Reisi, M. (2011). Network analysis method: Using the whole network approach in the study of open source communities. Iranian Journal of Social Studies, 5(2): 31-57. (Persian)
  6. Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Tilburg, A. and Gerhard, G. (2010). How social and humanCapital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's Handloom Industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1): 245-260.
  7. Bodin, Ö., Crona, B. and Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management – What’s there to learn from a structural perspective? Journal of Ecology and Society, 11(2): 2-10.
  8. Brown, M. (2003). Rural Tourism An Annotated Bibliography.
  9. Byrd, E., Bosley, H. and Dronberger, M. (2009). Comparisons of stakeholder perceptions of tourism impacts in rural eastern North Carolina. Tourism Management, 30(1): 693-703.
  10. Carlsson, L. and Sandström, A. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1): 33–54.
  11. Copeland, B. (2012). Tourism and Welfare‐Enhancing Export Subsidies. Jpnan Economic Review, 63(1): 232-243.
  12. Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization of Khorasan Razavi Province. (2019). Report on tourist areas of Binalood city. Tehran: Internal publication. (Persian)
  13. De Stefano, D., Fuccella, V., Vitale, M.P. and Zaccarin, S. (2013). The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance. Social Networks, 35(3): 370-381.
  14. Fallahtabar, N. (2017). Challenges of rural development initiatives from sustainable development perspective using the swot method. Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 7(4): 187-202. (Persian)
  15. Firoozrooz, M., Erfanzadeh, R., Ghorbani, M. and Rasekhi, S. (2015). Analysis of social network and structural model of social relations of rangeland users (Case study: Takor village - Noor city). Rangeland Scientific-Research Journal, 9(3): 244-254.
  16. Ghorbani, M., Salimi, J., Ebrahimi, P. and Rasekhi, S. (2019). Application of network analysis in identifying key actors of local stakeholder network in order to establish participatory management of natural resources (Study area: Sarayan watershed, South Khorasan province). Quarterly Journal of Rangeland and Watershed Management, 72(1): 213-226. (Persian)
  17. Helms, R., Ignacio, R., Brinkkemper, S. and Zonneveld, A. (2010). Limitations of network analysis for studying efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge sharing. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1): 53-68.
  18. Hwang, D. and Stewart, W. (2017). Social capital and collective action in rural tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 56(1): 81–93.
  19. Hwang, D., Chi, S.H. and Lee, B. (2016). Collective action that influences tourism: Social structural approach to community involvement. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 40(4): 497–515.
  20. Kapucu, N., Yuldashev, F., Demiroz, F. and Arslan, T. (2011). Social network analysis application in evaluating MPA classes. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(1): 541-563.
  21. Kellihera, F., Reinla, L., Johnson, T. and Joppec, M. (2018). The role of trust in building rural tourism micro firm network engagement: A multi-case study. Tourism Management, 68(1): 1-12.
  22. Łopaciuk, B. (2019). Does participation in social networks foster trust and respect for other people—evidence from Poland. Sustainability, 11(1733): 2-25.
  23. Magnar, F., Markus, S. and Karin, G. (2012). Stability and variety – Products, organization and institutionalization in farm tourism. Tourism Management, 33(4): 895-909.
  24. Martino, F. and Spoto, A. (2006). Social network analysis: A brief theoretical review and further perspectives inthe study of Information Technology. PsychNology Journal, 4(1): 53-86.
  25. Muresan, I., Oroian, C., Harun, R., Arion, F., Porutiu, A., Chiciudean, G. and Lile, R. (2016). Local residents’ attitude toward sustainable rural tourism development. Sustainability, 8(100): 1-12.
  26. Najaf Kani, A. and Mirzaali, M. (2012). Survey and assessment of people's participation and its role in rural development (Case study: Sultan Ali village of Gonbad Kavous city). Geographical Perspective (Human Studies), 7(20): 1-15. (Persian)
  27. Nasiri Moghadam, M. and Khoshsima, P. (2014). Strategic urban tourism for developing permanent rural development in Khogam in Rudbar. Geographical Journal of Tourism Space, 4(14): 1-11. (Persian)
  28. Nocheh Nasar, H., Shams, G. and Ghani Rad, M. (2018). Social network analysis Co-authorship of foreign articles by faculty members in the field of educational sciences. Journal of Scientometrics, 4(8): 33-56. (Persian)
  29. Otwori, J.L. and Khademi Vidra, A. (2019). Community-based tourism and sustainable development of rural regions in Kenya; Perceptions of the citizenry. Sustainability, 11(4733): 2 –23.
  30. Pourtaheri, M. and Naghavi, M. (2012). Physical development of rural settlements with sustainable development approach (Concepts, theories, strategies). Housing and Rural Environment, 31(137): 53-70. (Persian)
  31. Ramezani, A. and Mirza Mohammadi, A. (2013). Social network analysis with UCINET software training. Tehran: Sociologists Publishing. (Persian)
  32. Rezvani, M.R., Motiei Langroudi, H. and Mohammadzadeh Larijani, F. (2012). Explaining the functional developments of villages and the transition from agricultural economy to tourism with emphasis on life cycle theory: A case study of FiroozJah village. Journal of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 4(3): 107-122. (Persian)
  33. Roknaddin Eftekhari, A., and Mahdavi, D. (2006). The solutions of the rural tourism development with SWOT Methods (Case study: Lavasan-E-Koochak. The Journal of Spatial Planning, 10(2): 133-162. (Persian)
  34. Roknaddin Eftekhari, A., Sojasi Ghidari, H. and Einali, J. (2007). New attitude towards rural management with an emphasis on effective institutions. Journal of Village and Development, 10(2): 1-30. (Persian)
  35. Roknaddin Eftekhari, A., Mahmoodi, S., Ghaffari, G. and Pourtaheri, M. (2015). The explanation of spatial pattern of social capital with respect to sustainable rural development - Case: Villages of Razavi Khorasan, Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, 4(11): 87-108. (Persian)
  36. Sadeghi, H. and Seidaie, E.G. (2016). Evaluating the performance of institutions and their structures related to rural sustainability Case: Dehdez ward in Izeh city. Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, 5(2): 199-140. (Persian)
  37. Sattarzadeh, A., Glini Moghadam, G. and Momeni, A. (2016). Analysis of the structure of the network of scientific collaborations of researchers in the field of basic medical sciences in Iran in the science citation index in the period 1996 to 2013. Quarterly Journal of Scientific Studies, 2(6), 1-20. (Persian)
  38. Shamsoldini, A. (2011). Rural tourism constructive solution for rural development, case study: Fahlian village. Quarterly Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 131(29): 95-107. (Persian)
  39. Sharifzadeh, A. and Moradinejad, H. (2003). Sustainable development and rural tourism. Jihad Economic Monthly, 250(251): 63-52. (Persian)
  40. Srivastava, A., Anuradha, D. and Gupta, J. (2014). Social network analysis: Hardly easy. International Conference on Reliability,Optimization and Information Technology. Dehli: India.
  41. Stenberg, J. (2001). Bridging gaps: Sustainable development and local democracy processes.
  42. Sutawa, GK. (2012). Issues on bali tourism development and community empowerment to support sustainable tourism development. Procedia Economic and Financial, 4(1): 413-422.
  43. Telfer, D. (2009). Tourism and development in the developing world. New York: Routledge.
  44. Viry, G. (2017). Social network analysis: Mapping and exploring the network society. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
  45. Zahedi, S. and Najafi, G. (2006). Conceptual development of sustainable development. Quarterly Journal of Teacher of Humanities, 10(4): 76-43. (Persian)
  46. Zarafshani, K., Sharifi, L., Garavandi., S. and Ghobadi, P. (2013). The investigation of yourism development impact upon promotion of social – economic indices in rural areas (Case: Rijab resort in Kermanshah province). Journal Space Economy and Rural Development, 2(5): 119-134. (Persian)

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار