Drivers of Recognizing Entrepreneurial Opportunities for Rural Woman Entrepreneurs in Agricultural Sector of Ilam Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. candidate for Agricultural extension and Education, Islamic Azad University, Ilam Branch.

2 Assistant Professor at Agricultural Extension and Education Department, Islamic Azad University, Ilam Branch

3 Assistant Professor at Agricultural extension and Education Department, Islamic Azad University, Ilam Branch

4 Professor at Agricultural extension and Education Department, Ilam Branch. Islamic Azad University, Ilam. Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Considering capabilities including good weather conditions, four types of climate, raining, and fertile soil, Ilam province has many entrepreneurship potentials and opportunities in agricultural sector. It is obvious that recognizing entrepreneurial opportunities in agricultural sector and reducing unemployment rate are of high importance in such conditions. Despite the significance of this issue, researchers have not paid much attention to recognition of women’s entrepreneurship opportunities. Considering that entrepreneurship is a capacity to discover and utilize profitable opportunities in a competitive market, a low level of understanding and recognition of entrepreneurship opportunities by Iranian entrepreneurs is notable. Accordingly, it can be inferred that not recognizing existent potentials and opportunities in the agricultural sector for women is the main reason for the low rate of employment among women, thus improving capabilities to recognize entrepreneurial opportunities among job seekers is one of the best solutions to resolve unemployment and to develop entrepreneurship.
Methodology
The current study is a practical interpretive research. In terms of method, it is a qualitative research in which an inductive approach has been utilized. Semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis were utilized to analyze the data and the used texts, respectively. Semi-structured interview by an exploratory approach was utilized to achieve the goals of the qualitative research and to extract indicators related to recognition of entrepreneurial opportunities. Five selected female entrepreneurs in 2019, 6 professors in entrepreneurship field who were familiar with agricultural sector's concerns, and 6 employees in Agricultural Jahad Organizations with more than 15 years of service, were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Non-probability and purposive sampling using a snowball sampling approach was utilized to select the sample. Selecting the sample was continued to ensure sufficiency and saturation of the data and to ensure that the next samples do not provide different information. In this study, 17 participants were interviewed. Lincoln and Guba’s evaluation was utilized to investigate the reliability and validity of the coding stage in analyzing qualitative context.
Results and Discussion
Qualitative analysis of field interviews and their implementation and coding showed that among the main themes of recognition of entrepreneurial opportunities for rural women, “psychological features” by 77 frequencies were the main themes. This main theme includes some secondary themes such as creativity, independence, the need for cognition, self-efficacy in recognizing entrepreneurial opportunities, and the ability to understand and organize information. Alertness with a frequency of 62 was the second main theme. This includes primary knowledge, social networks, evaluation of information, and connecting new information and primary knowledge. “Entrepreneurial intelligence” by frequency of 60 was the 3rd main theme. It includes secondary themes such as entrepreneurial insight, cognitive intelligence, social intelligence, venture intelligence, and provocative intelligence. The 4th main theme was “environmental supports” with a frequency of 47. It includes financial, social, cultural, and political support. The 5th theme was “ human capital” with a frequency of 33. This theme includes cognitive knowledge and experience. “Social capital” which includes connected philanthropy was the 6th theme with a frequency of 29. Turbulence as the 7th main theme by frequency of 27 includes secondary themes such as factors related to environment and personality factors.
Conclusion
Analyzing information and the interviews showed that the main drivers for recognition of entrepreneurial opportunities can be categorized into seven categories ( social capital, human capital, psychological features, turbulence, entrepreneurial intelligence, alertness, and environmental support). Generally, in the current study, 124 initial codes, 97 conceptual codes, 25 basic ( main) themes, and 7 organizing (secondary) themes were recognized and extracted using thematic analysis of 17 interviews.
 
 

Keywords

References

  1. Abedi, H., Taslimi, M., Faqihi, A. & Sheikhzadeh, M. (2011). Content analysis and content network: A simple and efficient way to explain patterns in qualitative data. Strategic Management, 2(10), 151-189. [In Persian]
  2. Askun, B. & Yıldırım, N. (2011). Insights on entrepreneurship education in public universities in Turkey: Creating entrepreneurs or not? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 663-676.
  3. Audretsch, D.B., Aldridge, T.T. & Sanders. (2011). Social capital building and new business formation. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 152-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391939.
  4. Azizi, S., Motmeni, A. & Abdollahpour, A.R. (2012). Investigation of individual and social factors affecting the recognition of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 5(20), 7-25. [In Persian]
  5. Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Tilburg, A.V. & Bunt, G.G.V.D. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3): 245-260.
  6. Bosma, N. & Kelley, D. (2019). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2018/2019 global report. Available at: GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (gemconsortium.org).
  7. Braun, V. & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Reseach in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  8. Brettel, M., Mauer, R.. Engelen, A. & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167-184.
  9. Corbett, A.C. (2007). Learning a symmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 97-118.
  10. Delavar, A. (1995). Theoretical and practical founder of research in humanities and social sciences. Tehran. roshd publications. [In Persian]
  11. Dimov, D.P. (2003). The nexus of individual and opportunity: Opportunity recognition as a learning process. Babson Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Wellesley, USA.
  12. Djiver, J. (2006). Female entrepreneurs of the north breaking ground, current research issue in small business development commerce. Available at: http://www.civilica.com/.
  13. Fiet, J.O., Piskounov, A. & Patel, P.C. (2005). Still searching (systematically) for entrepreneurial discoveries. Small Business Economics, 25(5), 489-504.
  14. Gaglio, C. (2004). The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 533-552.
  15. George, N.M., Parida, V. Lahti, T. & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: Insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350.
  16. Ghadermarzi, H., Jamshidi, A., Jamini, D. & Nazari Sarmazeh, H. (2015). Identifying the barriers to entrepreneurship development for rural women (Case study: Shalil village-Ardal county). Journal of Regional Planning, 5(17), 103-118. [In Persian]
  17. Gholipour, R., Aghajani, H. & Karimi, M.K. (2009). A study of factors affecting the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities in the field of information technology. Quarterly Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 1(3), 123-158. [In Persian]
  18. Hashemian, M. (2000). Foresight of science and technology, foresight and evaluation of regional competitors and world champions in the field of science and technology. Tehran: University Publishing Center. [In Persian]
  19. Hoang, H., & Young. N. (2000). Social embeddedness and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: More evidence of embeddedness. Wellesley: Babson College.
  20. Kamali, Y. (2018). Methodology of content analysis and its application in public policy studies. Public Policy (Ministry of Science), 4(2), 189-208. [In Persian]
  21. Khoshmaram, M., Zarafshani, K., Alibeigi, A.H. & Mirkzadeh, A.A. (2014). Provide a conceptual model for identifying entrepreneurial opportunities in the agricultural sector. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 1(4), 105-122 .[In Persian]
  22. Khoshmaram, M., Zarafshani, K. Mirkzadeh, A.A. & Alibeigi, A.H. (2017). Designing and explaining a model for identifying entrepreneurial opportunities in the agricultural sector of Kermanshah province. Journal of Rural Research, 8(3), 391-402. [In Persian]
  23. Kordnaeij, Elahi, A.K. Zali, M. & Rafiei, M. (2012). Identifying entrepreneurial opportunities in the hospital Industry: A case study of Shariati hospital. Business Management Perspectives Quarterly, 11, 101-118. [In Persian]
  24. khosravi, S., Lashgarara, F., Poursaeed, A.R. & Omidi Najafabadi, M. (2022). Modeling the relationship between urban agriculture and sustainable development: A case study in Tehran city. Arabian Journal of Geoscience. 15(1): 97. Doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09396-y.
  25. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly hills, CA: Sage.
  26. Mehdizadeh, H., Shiri, N. & KhoshMaram, M. (2020). Ability to identify entrepreneurial opportunities among agricultural students of Ilam university. Journal of Entrepreneurship Strategies in Agriculture, 7(13), 78-86. [In Persian]
  27. Mehrani, A. (2011). An attitude towards barriers to women's employment and entrepreneurship the first annual conference on management, innovation and entrepreneurship, Shiraz. [In Persian] http://www.civilica.com/copid/MIEAC0 1-691-562612.PDF.
  28. Mirvahedi, S., Toghraei, M. & Sanjarian, Z. (2017). Investigating the effective factors on identifying entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 4(1), 53-74. [In Persian]
  29. Namamian, F., Elyasi, R. & Izadi, H. (2017). Methodology and method of quantitative qualitative and combined research (first edition ed.). Mehraban book institute. [In Persian]
  30. Narimani, A. & Waezi, R. (2017). Identifying factors facilitating the commercialization of public management knowledge research. Public Management Quarterly, 9(2), 235-262. [In Persian]
  31. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
  32. Raif, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F. & Watson, B. (2002). Media message analysis: The application of quantitative content analysis in research. Translated by Mahdokht Borojerdi Alavi. Tehran: Soroush Publications.
  33. Pourjavid, S., Poursaeed, A.R. & Mirdamadi, S.M. (2020). Modeling the effectiveness of urban agriculture education courses”. Urban Ecosystems. 23, 927-932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00955-x.
  34. Salmani Cheraghabadi, A.R., Poursaeed, A.R., Bayramzadeh, V. & EshraghiSamani, R. (2021). Social network analysis of sustainable forest management actors in Zagros region. Arabian Journal of Geoscience. 14, 2701. Doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09032-9.
  35. Saremi, M. & Alizadeh Sani, M. (2009). Investigating factors influencing the process of identifying entrepreneurial opportunities among top entrepreneurs selected. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 1(3):103-122. [In Persian]
  36. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  37. Shepherd, D.A. & DeTienne, D.R. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward and opportunity identification, entrerenurship. Theory and Practice, 29(1), 91-112.
  38. Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Population and Housing Census. Iran: Tehran. [In Persian]
  39. Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Manag Decis, 39(7), 551-556.
  40. Striling, J.A. (2001). Thematic network. an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 285-405.
  41. Szerb, L., Autio, E. Lloyd, A. & Ács, Z. (2018). The global entrepreneurship index. The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute, USA: Washington, D.C.
  42. Tang, J. (2009). How entrepreneurs discover opportunities in China: An institutional view. Asia pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 461-479. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9151-6.
  43. Vaezi, R., Chegini, M. & Aslipour, H. (2018). Policy challenges in the field of health tourism in Iran based on thematic analysis approach. Journal of Tourism Management Studies, 13(41), 1-14. [In Persian]
  44. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E. Neubaum, D.O. & Shulman, J.M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics