Village and Development

Village and Development

Typology of Rural Development Activists' Mentalities on Rural Industrialization

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
M. Noruzi 1
Kh. Kalantari 2
H. Shabanali Fami 2
A. Asadi 3
1 Assistant Professor of Operations and Productivity Management Department, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, University of Imam Sadiq (a.s), Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Agricultural Management and Development, Faculty of Agriculture, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Agricultural Management and Development, Agricultural Economics and Development, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.30490/rvt.2025.367340.1637
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Rural industrialization is a key aspect of economic diversification in rural areas, but stakeholders in rural development have diverse perspectives on this process. This study examines the different ideological frameworks of rural development actors and how they influence policy and practice. The lack of cohesive strategies for rural industrialization has led to socio-economic disparities and cultural erosion in rural communities.
Materials and Methods
This research used Q-methodology to analyze the subjective perspectives of 17 key stakeholders, including policymakers and local leaders. Participants ranked 40 statements on rural industrialization, leading to the identification of four distinct mentalities through factor analysis.
Results and Discussion
Four mentalities were identified: Cultural Preservationists, Industrial Integrationists, Anti-Industrial Advocates, and Structural Reformists. The study highlights the challenges in translating recognition of rural-urban differences into effective policies, with a focus on the need for context-driven approaches.
Conclusions
The study emphasizes the need for consensus-building mechanisms among stakeholders, localized models for rural development, and institutional reforms to address policy fragmentation. Future research should explore how global trends impact rural development mentalities and strategies.
Keywords
Activists Mentalities
Q-Methodology
Rural Development
Rural Industrialization

Subjects

1.      Hajati Ziabari, N. (2012). Examining appropriate strategies for expanding and activating rural industries, National Conference on Rural Development, Rasht, Iran. [In Persian]
2.      Khoshgouianfard, A. (2007). Q Methodology. Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran Radio and Television. [In Persian]
3.      Ghofran, M., & Baradaran Shahroudi, Z. (2010), Sustainable Rural Income: Strategies and Solutions. Mashhad: Rangin Ketab. [In Persian]
4.      Molavi, M. (2011). Investigating the role of rural industries in the process of economic and social development (Case study of villages in Mahabad city). Master's Thesis, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Tabriz. [In Persian]
5.      Moradi, M., & Motiee Langrodi, S.H. (2005). The position of industries in the process of industrialization and rural development of the central part of Birjand County. Geographical Research, 37(53), 137-149. [In Persian]
6.      Motiee Langrodi, S.H., & Najafi Kani, A.A. (2011). Rural development and industrialization (Theories, methods and strategies of industrial development). Tehran: Tehran University Printing and Publishing Institute. [In Persian]
7.      Kemp, T. (1993). Historical Patterns of Industrialization. London:  Routledge.
8.      Motiee Langroodi, S.H., Toorani, A., & Soleimangoli, R. (2011). Assessment of spatial consequences of establishment of industrial towns in rural areas (case study central part of Minudasht). Urban - Regional Studies and Research Journal, 3(9), 37-58. [In Persian]
9.      Taherkhani, M. (2000), Industrialization of villages, General Directorate of Industrial Plans and Exploitation, First edition, Tehran. [In Persian]