Village and Development

Village and Development

Effects of Weather Variables and Price Changes on Acreage Response of Selected Rainfed Crops in Rural Areas of Kurdistan Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
M. Ghahremanzadeh 1
Gh. Dashti 1
A. Falsafian 2
N. Yadeghar 3
K. Gholipour 4
P. Pakrooh 5
1 Professor in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Management, Ta. C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
3 Master of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz. Tabriz, Iran.
4 Ph.D. Candidate of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
5 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy.
10.30490/rvt.2025.367428.1663
Abstract
Introduction
Changing in weather variables are considered as one of the most significant risks facing the agricultural sector, profoundly affecting the yield and price of agricultural products, especially rainfed crops. Farmers typically respond to these climatic and environmental changes by adjusting their cultivated area of these products, reflecting their most natural reaction. They align their production strategies with these alterations. Thus, it is crucial to analyze how climate factors influence risk and yield, particularly concerning rainfed wheat, chickpeas, and barley crops in Kurdistan Province, a key production hub for these crops. This analysis is essential for evaluating the risk-enhancing effects of these factors, similar to other provinces in the country. The aim of this study is to explore the acreage response of rainfed wheat, chickpeas, and barley crops in Kurdistan Province to changes in climate and prices.
Meterials and Methods
In the initial phase, the stochastic production function approach of Just and Pope was employed to analyze the effects of weather factor variations on the yield and yield risk of crop production, utilizing panel data estimation techniques that combine time-series and cross-sectional data from the counties of Bijar, Gharveh, Saghez, Kamyaran, and Divandarreh, which are crucial production areas for these crops. In the subsequent phase, under the framework of the von Neumann and Morgenstern expected utility function, the acreage response functions for these rainfed crops were estimated and analyzed using the seemingly unrelated regression (SURE) system. Climate data were collected from the meteorological stations in the five counties, while additional necessary data were sourced from the Agricultural Jihad Organization of the province, the Statistical Center of Iran, and the Central Bank, covering the period from 1987 to 2022.
Results and discussion
The study's findings indicated that factors such as precipitation, average minimum temperature, and average relative humidity during the growth period positively influence crop yields, while average maximum temperature and wind speed negatively affect the yields of the selected crops. The estimation results of the yield risk function revealed that cumulative precipitation during the growth period, average maximum temperature, average wind speed, and the interaction between average wind speed and average maximum temperature significantly impact the risk associated with rainfed wheat. For rainfed chickpeas, the yield risk function estimation results demonstrated that average maximum and minimum temperatures, average relative humidity, and average wind speed significantly influence the risk. Cumulative precipitation in the spring season, average wind speed in spring, average summer temperature, and average spring temperature have substantial effects on the risk for rainfed barley. The acreage response functions for these crops indicate that as expected profit rises, the cultivated area expands. Conversely, an increase in the variance of expected profit leads to a decrease in the cultivated area for each crop. Specifically, when profit volatility of rainfed wheat increases, it results in an expansion of the cultivated area for rainfed chickpeas, and similarly, an increase in rainfed wheat's expected profit variance also contributes to a rise in the cultivated area of rainfed barley, and vice versa.
Conclusions
As farmers’ wealth increases, the cultivated areas for wheat and chickpeas also expand. Consequently, wheat and chickpea farmers display decreasing absolute risk aversion, while barley farmers exhibit constant absolute risk aversion. Therefore, in environments of increased market risk, non-price policies aimed at expanding the cultivated area of barley and price-based policies for wheat and chickpeas can be effective.
Keywords
Acreage Response
Weather Factors
Panel Data
Price and Yield Risk
Rainfed Crops
Subjects
1.      Asadi, H., Zamanian, G., Shahiki Tash, M., Ghorbani, M., & Jalal Kamali, M. (2020). Determination of marginal effects of climatic and phenotypic factors on risk and average yield of irrigated wheat lines in breeding research. Applied Field Crops Research, 33(02), 1-23. doi: 10.22092/aj.2019.121330.1271. [In Persian]
2.      Asche, F., & Tveterås, R. (1999). Modeling production risk with a two-step procedure. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 424-439. 
3.      Askari, H., & Cummings, J.T. (1977). Estimating agricultural supply response with the Nerlove model: a survey. International Economic Review, 257-292. 
4.      Cabas, J., Weersink, A., & Olale, E. (2010). Crop yield response to economic, site and climatic variables. Climatic Change, 101(3), 599-616.
5.      Dashti, G., Bagheri, P., Pishbahar, E., & Majnooni, A. (2018). The calculation of yield risk caused by climate change for rainfed wheat in Ahar county: Weather Value at Risk Approach application. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 32(2), 139-153. doi: 10.22067/jead2.v32i2.68545. [In Persian] 
6.      Dawe, D., & Timmer, C.P. (2012). Why stable food prices are a good thing: Lessons from stabilizing rice prices in Asia. Global Food Security, 1(2), 127-133. 
7.      Garshasbi, A., Yavari, K., Najarzadeh, R., & Homayunifar, M. (2012). Price and non-price factors effects on wheat Acreage in provinces by using Panel Data. Agricultural Economics, 6(2), 189-204. [In Persian]
8.      Ghahremanzadeh, M., & Golbaz, M. (2015). The impact of climate variables on wheat and corn yield and yield risk in Gazvin Province. Agricultural Economics, 8(4), 107-126. [In Persian]
9.      Haile, M.G., Kalkuhl, M., & Von Braun, J. (2016). Worldwide acreage and yield response to international price change and volatility: A dynamic panel data analysis for wheat, rice, corn, and soybeans (pp. 139-165). Springer International Publishing.
10.  Hayat Gheibi, F., Shahnooshi, N., Mohammadzadeh, R., & Azarinfar, Y. (2009). Study of wheat supply reaction model in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 1(2), 91-107. [In Persian]
11.  Hazzel, B.R., & Norton, R.D. (1986) Mathematical programming for economic analysis agriculture. Macmillan’s. New York.
12.  Hubbard, L.J., Lingard, J., & Webster, J.P.G. (2000). Romanian wheat prices: is there a need for stabilisation?. Food Policy, 25(1), 55-67.
13.  Imai, K.S., Gaiha, R., & Thapa, G. (2011). Supply response to changes in agricultural commodity prices in Asian countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(1), 61-75. 
14.  Javadi, A., Ghahremanzadeh, M., Sassi, M., Javanbakht, O., & Hayati, B. (2024). Impact of climate variables change on the yield of wheat and rice crops in Iran (application of stochastic model based on Monte Carlo simulation). Computational Economics, 63(3), 983-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10389-0
15.  Just, R.E., & Pope, R.D. (1979). Production function estimation and related risk considerations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 276-284. 
16.  Komarek, A.M., De Pinto, A., & Smith, V.H. (2020). A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 178, 102738. 
17.  Liang, Y., Miller, J.C., Harri, A., & Coble, K.H. (2011). Crop supply response under risk: impacts of emerging issues on Southeastern US agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 43(2), 181-194. 
18.  Lin, W. (1977). Measuring aggregate supply response under instability. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(5), 903-907.
19.  Lin, W., & Dismukes, R. (2007). Supply response under risk: Implications for counter‐cyclical payments' production impact. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 29(1), 64-86. 
20.  Mbua, I.A., & Atta-Aidoo, J. (2023). Acreage supply response of sugarcane out-growers in Tanzania: A vector error correction model (VECM) approach. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(1), 2229575. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2229575
21.  Meuwissen, M.P., Huirne, R.B.M., & Hardaker, J.B. (2001). Risk and risk management: an empirical analysis of Dutch livestock farmers. Livestock production science, 69(1), 43-53. 
22.  Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (2023). Agricultural Statistics Yearbook. Tehran. Available at www.maj.ir
23.  Moazzezi, F., Yavari, G.R., Mosavi, S.H., & Bagheri, M. (2020). Assessing the impact of climate change on agriculture in Hamedan-Bahar plain with emphasis on water productivity and food security. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 34(3), 305-323. doi: 10.22067/jead.2020.17793.0. [In Persian]
24.  Mohammadian, M., Chizari, A.M., & Motrazavi, A. (1995). The effect of rice price risk control in commodity exchange conditions on the optimal cultivation pattern: a case study of Golestan province, Gonbad-Minodasht region. Agricultural Economics and Development, 49(1), 169-194. [In Persian]
25.  Najafi Alamdarlo, H. (2009). Economic Evaluation of Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture: Case study of Wheat. MSc. Thesis. Agricultural Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran.
26.  Nerlove, M. (1956). Estimates of the elasticities of supply of selected agricultural commodities. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 38(2), 496-509. 
27.  Nobahar Khosrowshahi, F. (2023). Acreage Response of Selected Irrigated Crops in East Azerbaijan Province to Price and Climate Changes. Msc. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. [In Persian]
28.  Petrović, G., Ivanović, T., Knežević, D., Radosavac, A., Obhođaš, I., Brzaković, T., & Dragičević Radičević, T. (2023). Assessment of climate change impact on maize production in Serbia. Atmosphere, 14(1), 110. 
29.  Rafiee, Z., Mosavi, S.H.A., & Khalilian, S. (2019). The investigation of climate change effect on agricultural production risk; the case of wheat in Fars province. Agricultural Economics, 13(3), 87-110. doi: 10.22034/iaes.2019.112167.1713. [In Persian]
30.  Rao, J.M. (1989). Agricultural supply response: A survey. Agricultural Economics, 3(1), 1-22. 
31.  Rezitis, A.N., & Stavropoulos, K.S. (2012). Greek meat supply response and price volatility in a rational expectations framework: A multivariate GARCH approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(2), 309-333. 
32.  Rostami, F., Shaban Ali, H., Movahed Mohammadi, H., & Irvani, H. (2008). Factors affecting on the adoption toward insurance (Case study: Harsin county in Kermanshah province). Agricultural Economics and Development, 15(4), 1-22. doi: 10.30490/aead.2008.58875. [In Persian]
33.  Torkamani, J., & Rezaei, B. (2000). Estimating input demand functions and supply of wheat in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 31(2), 87-114. [In Persian] 
34.  Weersink, A., Cabas, J.H., & Olale, E. (2010). Acreage response to weather, yield, and price. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie, 58(1), 57-72. 
35.  Zareii, N., Dourandish, A., Alibakhshi, H., & Sabouhi, M. (2022). The effect of climate change on the yield of major cereals in Iran. Agricultural Economics, 16(2), 27-46. doi: 10.22034/iaes.2022.539359.1871. [In Persian]