تعیین قابلیت اراضی برای توسعه کشاورزی و مرتع‌داری مناطق روستایی حوضه آبخیز ساری- قمیش استان اردبیل

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 عضو باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران

3 کارشناس مؤسسه پژوهش‌های برنامه‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی و دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد توسعه روستایی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسه روش‌های دکتر مخدوم و تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی- فازی برای ارزیابی توان بوم‌شناختی حوزه آبخیز ساری قمیش استان اردبیل برای انجام فعالیت‌های کشاورزی و مرتع‌داری بود. بعد از مشخص شدن معیارهای ارزیابی، از روش AHP  برای وزن‏دهی و از روش فازی در محیط نرم‌افزار Idrisi Selva برای هم‌مقیاس‌سازی لایه‌ها استفاده شد. در روش تحلیل سیستمی مخدوم، با تلفیق لایه‌های اطلاعاتی، نقشه یگان‌های بوم‌شناختی منطقه به همراه جدول ویژگی‌های واحد، تهیه و منطقه ارزیابی شد، و طبقات مختلف کشاوری و مرتع‌داری مشخص شدند. طبق نتایج به‌دست آمده، در روش تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی- فازی، 9/3532 هکتار (94/65 درصد) و در روش تحلیل سیستمی 2/635 هکتار (85/11 درصد) از منطقه توان توسعه کشاورزی دارد؛ همچنین، در مقایسه با روش تحلیل سیستمی، روش تحلیل سلسله‏‌مراتبی دارای انعطاف‌پذیری بیشتر و نیز مطابقت بیشتر با وضعیت موجود کاربری اراضی در منطقه بوده و از این‌رو، بهتر است در مطالعات ارزیابی سرزمین، از این روش استفاده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Land Capability Assessment for Development of Agricultural and Range Activities in Rural Areas of Sari-Qamish Watershed, Ardabil Province of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marzieh ALIKHAH ASL 1
  • Darioush NASERI 2
  • Mohammad DOSHVARPASAND 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Member of Young Researchers Club, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
3 MSc. Graduate in Rural Development, Payam Noor University, Tehran Branch, and Expert of Agricultural Planning, Economics & Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study aimed at comparing the methods of Makhdoom System Analysis and Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for assessing the ecological capability of Sari-Qamish watershed in Ardabil province of Iran for agricultural and range management activities. After determining the criteria, AHP method was used for weighting; and Fuzzy method was used in Idrisi Selva software for applying semi scale to the layers. In the method of Makhdoom System Analysis, the map of ecological units of the area along with the table of characteristics of the units were prepared by integrating the information layers, and the area was evaluated; then, different classes of farming and rangeland were identified. According to the results, in AHP-Fuzzy method, 3532.9 hectares (65.94 percent) and in the System Analysis method, 635.2 hectares (11.85 percent) of the region had the potential for agriculture. Moreover, the results showed that for agriculture and range management uses, in the System Analysis method, there were classes 3, 4, 5 and 6 and in AHP-Fuzzy method, there were classes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the region. The overall study results showed that compared with the System Analysis method, the Fuzzy-AHP method had more flexibility and more consistency with the existing status of land use in the region. So, it was suggested to use AHP-FUZZY method in studying land capability assessment instead of using System Analysis method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Land Capability
  • Multivariate Evaluation
  • Sari-Qamish (Watershed)
  • Agriculture-Range Management
  • Ardabil (Province)

مراجع

  1. Kalagar, P. and Aghaei, M. (2012). Studying the role of rural entrepreneur in village development. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 1: 61-83. (Persian)
  2. Ansari, N., Akhlaghi Shal, S. and Ghasemi, M. (2008). Determination of socio-economic factors on natural resources degradation of Iran. Range and Desert Research, 15(4): 508-524. (Persian)
  3. Nouri, S.H., Seyedaei, S.A., Kiani, S., Soltani, Z., Nowrouzi-Avergani, A. (2010). Evaluation of environment ecological capability to determine suitable areas for agriculture using GIS (central zone of Kiar township). Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 37: 33-46. (Persian)
  4. Karami, O., Hosseini Nasr, S.M., Jalilvand, H. and Miryaghubzadeh, M.H. (2013). Land capability evaluation in Babolroud watershed for agriculture using AHP method. Journal of Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 5(1): 38-48. (Persian)
  5. Nouri Zamanabadi, S.H., Seydaei, S.A., Kiani Salmi, S., Nowroozi Avargani, A. (2010). Land capability evaluation for agricultural area using GIS (case study: central part of Kiar town). Geography and Environmental Planning, 21(37): 33-44. (Persian)
  6. Grigsen, H., Faliot, P. and Brooks, K. (2009). Integrated watershed management (water and land to the people), Translated by H. Parvaresh. Bandar Abbas: University of Hormozgan.
  7. Makhdoom, M. (2001). Cornerstone land surveying. Tehran: Tehran University. (Persian)
  8. Ghorovi, M.H. (1986). The catastrophe lurks. Forest and Range Magazine, 3: 12-13.
  9. Ounagh, M. (1997). Assessing the productive capacity and management of rangelands using the GIS system. The First National Seminar on Range and Rangeland Management in Iran. (Persian)
  10.  Karam, A. (2005). Land potential evaluation for urban development in northwest of Tabriz County using MCE method in Geographic Information System. Physical Geography Research Quarterly, 54: 94-106. (Persian)
  11. Montgomery, B., Dragic´evic, S., Dujmovic´, J. and Schmidt, M. (2016). GIS-based logic scoring of preference method for evaluation of land capability and suitability for agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 124: 340-353.
  12.  Mohammadi, J. and Givi, J. (2001). Land potential assessment for wheat in Falavarjan region of Isfahan using fuzzy theory. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1: 103-115. (Persian)
  13.  Motiei Langroudi, S.H., Nasiri, H., Azizi, A. and Mostafaei, A. (2012). Modelling of land capability evaluation from the viewpoint of agriculture and rangeland uses using fuzzy AHP method in GIS. Land Use Planning, 4(6): 101-124.  (Persian)
  14.  Mohamadpour, A., Valipour, V., Mobaher Moghaddam, E. and Fataei, P. (2016). Land capability evaluation for agriculture and range using Geographic Information System. The 2nd International Conference on Modern Ideas in Agriculture, Environment and Tourism. Ardabil, the Institute of Ideological Supporters. (Persian)
  15.  Ayalew, G. (2015). A geographic information system based physical land suitability evaluation to groundnut and sweet potato in east Amhara, Highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 5(1).
  16.  Yi, X. and Wang, L. (2013). Land suitability assessment on a watershed of Loess Plateau using the analytic hierarchy process. PLOS ONE, 8(12).
  17.  Raeisi, M., Safyanian, A. and Ghoddousi, H. (2014). Sitting industries with weighted linear combination methodology in a GIS environment in Great Isfahan Region. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(4): 87-93. (Persian)
  18.  Schmucker, K.J. (1982). Fuzzy sets, natural language computations and risk analysis. Computer Science Press (Idrisi Selva Software Help).
  19.  Alimohammadi, Sh. (2006). Site selection for urban parks using GIS (case study: Isfahan first urban region). Master of Science Thesis in Desertification Course, Isfahan University. (Persian)
  20.  Forman, E. and Selly, M. (2001). Decision by objectives (how to convince others that you are right). World Scientific Press (Electronic Book).
  21.  Warren, L. (2004). Uncertainties in the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Australia (Electric Book).

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار